Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample.

Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Abstract Text:

    ira h bernsteinIra H Bernstein,a john rushA John Rush,thomas j carmodyThomas J Carmody,ada wooAda Woo,madhukar h trivediMadhukar H Trivedi,ira h bernsteinIra H Bernstein,a john rushA John Rush,thomas j carmodyThomas J Carmody,ada wooAda Woo,madhukar h trivediMadhukar H Trivedi,

    OBJECTIVES: Recent work using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) has found that the self-report (QIDS-SR(16)) and clinician-rated (QIDS-C(16)) versions of the 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology were generally comparable in outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD). This report extends this comparison to a less well-educated, more treatment-resistant sample that included more ethnic/racial minorities using IRT and selected classical test analyses. METHODS: The QIDS-SR(16) and QIDS-C(16) were obtained in a sample of 441 outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD seen in the public sector in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). The Samejima graded response IRT model was used to compare the QIDS-SR(16) and QIDS-C(16). RESULTS: The nine symptom domains in the QIDS-SR(16) and QIDS-C(16) related well to overall depression. The slopes of the item response functions, a, which index the strength of relationship between overall depression and each symptom, were extremely similar with the two measures. Likewise, the CTT and IRT indices of symptom frequency (item means and locations of the item response functions, b(i) were also similar with these two measures. For example, sad mood and difficulty with concentration/decision making were highly related to the overall depression severity with both the QIDS-C(16) and QIDS-SR(16). Likewise, sleeping difficulties were commonly reported, even though they were not as strongly related to overall magnitude of depression. CONCLUSION: In this less educated, socially disadvantaged sample, differences between the QIDS-C(16) and QIDS-SR(16) were minor. The QIDS-SR(16) is a satisfactory substitute for the more time-consuming QIDS-C(16) in a broad range of adult, nonpsychotic, depressed outpatients.

    Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ih bernsteinIH Bernstein,aj rushAJ Rush,tj carmodyTJ Carmody,a wooA Woo,mh trivediMH Trivedi,ih bernsteinIH Bernstein,aj rushAJ Rush,tj carmodyTJ Carmody,a wooA Woo,mh trivediMH Trivedi,

    For similar public sector research abstracts see: public sector research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Journal of psychiatric research

    VOLUME: 41

    Page Numbers: 239-46

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0022-3956

    DAY: 22

    MONTH: 05

    YEAR: 2006

    Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 376331

    Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Public Sector

    MESH TERMS: psychology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample.

    AFFILIATION: The University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 19528, Arlington, TX 76019-0528, USA.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NIMH

    GRANT: MH-68852

    ACRONYM: MH

    MEDLINETA: J Psychiatr Res

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Clinical vs self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News