Chopped liver...all over again.

Chopped liver...all over again. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

Chopped liver...all over again. Abstract Text:

R J Stanley,

Chopped liver...all over again. Publishing Authors By Initials

RJ Stanley,

For similar diagnosis: diagnostic techniques and procedures: mass screening research abstracts see: diagnosis: diagnostic techniques and procedures: mass screening research

PUBMED ID PMID:

MEDLINE DATE:

Chopped liver...all over again. Journal Published:

PUBLICATION TYPE: Letter

Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

VOLUME: 178

Page Numbers: 1288; author reply 1288-9

Journal Abbreviation:

ISSN: 0361-803X

DAY: 15

MONTH: May

YEAR: 2002

Chopped liver...all over again. Information

Number of References:

LANGUAGE: eng

NlmUniqueID: 7708173

Chopped liver...all over again. Keywords Mesh Terms:

KEYWORDS: Mass Screening

MESH TERMS: diagnosis

Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Chopped liver...all over again. Information

Substance Name:

Registry Number:

Grant and Affiliation Information for Chopped liver...all over again.

AFFILIATION:

Country: United States

AGENCY:

GRANT:

ACRONYM:

MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

REFSOURCE: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Nov;177(5):989

DATABASENAME:

ACCESSION NUMBER:

Number Hits: 0

Chopped liverall over again Related Publications

• "Early" breast cancer detection using techniques other than mammography.
• Basic Physics and Doubts about Relationship between Mammographically Determined Tissue Density and Breast Cancer Risk.
• Bias in the medical journals: a commentary.
• Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
• CT-guided preoperative needle localization of MR imaging-detected mammographically occult lesions.
• Chopped liver...all over again.
• Clip placement during sonographically guided breast biopsy.
• Conventional wisdom: observation, experience, anecdote, and science in breast imaging.
• Detecting nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer: the role of routine mammographic screening of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions.
• How should I respond to clinicians who ask me about breast cancer screening for women 40-50 years of age?
• Informed decision making: age of 50 is arbitrary and has no demonstrated influence on breast cancer screening in women.
• Mammography after conservative treatment of breast cancer.
• Migration of breast biopsy localization wire.
• Minimal-volume excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.
• More on sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
• Older is better.
• Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.
• Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.
• Preoperative needle localization of lesions in the lower half of the breast: needle entry from below.
• Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.
• Problems with the American College of Radiology Standard for Diagnostic Mammography.
• Re: Interval breast cancers in the screening mammography program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
• Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection.
• Sonography should not be used for breast cancer screening until its efficacy has been proven scientifically.
• Stability of a mammographic mass: a false sense of security.
• The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree.
• The most recent breast cancer screening controversy about whether mammographic screening benefits women at any age: nonsense and nonscience.
• The pendent view: an additional projection to confirm the diagnosis of milk of calcium.
• The positive predictive value of mammography.
• The sternalis muscle: an unusual normal finding seen on mammography.