Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

[Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.]

[Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Abstract Text:

    tian-min xuTian-min Xu,yan liuYan Liu,wei huangWei Huang,jiu-xiang linJiu-xiang Lin,

    OBJECTIVE: To compare soft-tissue morphology changes by cephalometric measurements between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases. METHODS: The samples consisted of 33 cases selected as borderline cases by 5 orthodontic specialists. They were divided into 21 extraction cases (including 13 four first premolar extraction cases and 8 four second premolar extraction cases) and 12 non-extraction cases by checking patients' treatment records. Conventional cephalometric analysis was made to compare soft tissue structures before and after orthodontic treatments and the same comparison was made between two different extraction patterns. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found in pretreatment soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction groups divided from borderline cases. The PosBs/FH of the four first premolars extraction group was smaller than that of non-extraction group, and the Ns-Sn-Pos of the four first premolars extraction group was smaller than that of four second premolar extraction group. None of the post-treatment soft-tissue measures showed significant statistical differences between four first premolars extraction group and non-extraction group, but there were 6 items showed significant statistical differences between four second premolars extraction group and non-extraction group. Compared with extraction and non-extraction treatments, the most significant soft-tissue changes were: PosBs/FH, LL-SnPos, and Bs-EP . CONCLUSION: Although pre-treatment soft-tissue morphology of second premolar extraction group was close to that of non-extraction group, the post-treatment soft-tissue morphology of first premolar extraction group became closer to that of non-extraction group.Compared with non-extraction treatment, the more significant changes caused by extraction treatment were located in the lower lip and chin, but not the upper lips.

    [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Publishing Authors By Initials

    tm xuTM Xu,y liuY Liu,w huangW Huang,jx linJX Lin,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Pe

    VOLUME: 36

    Page Numbers: 650-4

    Journal Abbreviation: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao

    ISSN: 1671-167X

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: Dec

    YEAR: 2004

    [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: chi

    NlmUniqueID: 101125284

    [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.] Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for [Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases.]

    AFFILIATION: Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China. tmxu@263.net

    Country: China

    China Research PublicationChina Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News