Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning.

Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Abstract Text:

    marc marscharkMarc Marschark,greg leighGreg Leigh,patricia saperePatricia Sapere,denis burnhamDenis Burnham,carol convertinoCarol Convertino,michael stinsonMichael Stinson,harry knoorsHarry Knoors,mathijs p j vervloedMathijs P J Vervloed,william nobleWilliam Noble,

    Four experiments examined the utility of real-time text in supporting deaf students' learning from lectures in postsecondary (Experiments 1 and 2) and secondary classrooms (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 1 compared the effects on learning of sign language interpreting, real-time text (C-Print), and both. Real-time text alone led to significantly higher performance by deaf students than the other two conditions, but performance by deaf students in all conditions was significantly below that of hearing peers who saw lectures without any support services. Experiment 2 compared interpreting and two forms of real-time text, C-Print and Communication Access Real-Time Translation, at immediate testing and after a 1-week delay (with study notes). No significant differences among support services were obtained at either testing. Experiment 3 also failed to reveal significant effects at immediate or delayed testing in a comparison of real-time text, direct (signed) instruction, and both. Experiment 4 found no significant differences between interpreting and interpreting plus real-time text on the learning of either new words or the content of television programs. Alternative accounts of the observed pattern of results are considered, but it is concluded that neither sign language interpreting nor real-time text have any inherent, generalized advantage over the other in supporting deaf students in secondary or postsecondary settings. Providing deaf students with both services simultaneously does not appear to provide any generalized benefit, at least for the kinds of materials utilized here.

    Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Publishing Authors By Initials

    m marscharkM Marschark,g leighG Leigh,p sapereP Sapere,d burnhamD Burnham,c convertinoC Convertino,m stinsonM Stinson,h knoorsH Knoors,mp vervloedMP Vervloed,w nobleW Noble,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, U.S. Gov't,

    Journal: Journal of deaf studies and deaf education

    VOLUME: 11

    Page Numbers: 421-37

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1081-4159

    DAY: 23

    MONTH: 08

    YEAR: 2006

    Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9889915

    Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning.

    AFFILIATION: Center for Education Research Partnerships, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, 96 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. marc.marschark@rit.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News