Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task.

Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Abstract Text:

    hall r beckHall R Beck,mary t dzindoletMary T Dzindolet,linda g pierceLinda G Pierce,hall r beckHall R Beck,mary t dzindoletMary T Dzindolet,linda g pierceLinda G Pierce,

    BACKGROUND: It was proposed that misuse and disuse often occur because operators (a) cannot determine if automation or a nonautomated alternative maximizes the likelihood of task success (appraisal errors) or (b) know the utilities of the options but disregard this information when deciding to use automation (intent errors). OBJECTIVE: This investigation assessed the effectiveness of performance feedback, a procedure developed to attenuate appraisal errors, and scenario training, an intervention designed to decrease intent errors. METHODS: Operators given feedback were told how many errors they and an automated device made on a target detection task. Scenario training took operators through the thought processes of optimal decision makers after the utilities of the automated and nonautomated alternatives had been determined. Following 200 training trials, participants chose between relying on their observations or an automated device. RESULTS: There was little misuse, but disuse rates were high (84%) among operators receiving neither feedback nor scenario training. Operators paired with a more accurate machine and given feedback made approximately twice as many errors as the automated device. Nevertheless, intent errors were commonplace; 55% of the operators who received feedback without scenario training did not rely on automation. Feedback effectiveness was enhanced when used in conjunction with scenario training; the disuse rate decreased to 29%. CONCLUSION: A combination of feedback and scenario training was more effective in mitigating disuse than either intervention used in isolation. APPLICATION: An important application of these findings is that operator training programs should incorporate techniques to control intent and appraisal errors.

    Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Publishing Authors By Initials

    hr beckHR Beck,mt dzindoletMT Dzindolet,lg pierceLG Pierce,hr beckHR Beck,mt dzindoletMT Dzindolet,lg pierceLG Pierce,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Human factors

    VOLUME: 49

    Page Numbers: 429-37

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0018-7208

    DAY: 7

    MONTH: Jun

    YEAR: 2007

    Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 374660

    Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task.

    AFFILIATION: Psychology Department, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. beckhp@appstate.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Hum Factors

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News