Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.

Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Abstract Text:

    m katoM Kato,m kaiseM Kaise,j yonezawaJ Yonezawa,y yoshidaY Yoshida,h tajiriH Tajiri,m katoM Kato,m kaiseM Kaise,j yonezawaJ Yonezawa,y yoshidaY Yoshida,h tajiriH Tajiri,

    BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Preliminary studies have suggested autofluorescence endoscopy (AFE) to be accurate in the diagnosis of gastric tumors. Our prospective blinded study systematically compared AFE with white light endoscopy (WLE) for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An enriched population included 33 patients with superficial gastric neoplasia referred for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 18 control patients undergoing follow-up endoscopy after curative ESD. At the direction of a study coordinator, two endoscopists who were blinded to the patient's history and to each other's findings, performed WLE followed by AFE or performed AFE alone, in random order. Both endoscopists independently recorded the presence of lesions seen at AFE and WLE. All lesions identified in either test were biopsied and the pathological results were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: 39 gastric neoplasias were histologically confirmed and 52 non-neoplastic lesions were found to be either WLE- and/or AFE-positive. Sensitivities of WLE and AFE alone were 74 % vs. 64 % (n. s.) and specificities were 83 % vs. 40 % ( P = 0.0003), respectively. WLE followed by AFE had a sensitivity of 69 % (n. s.) and a specificity of 64 % ( P = 0.046 compared with WLE alone). Of all neoplasias finally diagnosed, 13 % (or in the case of elevated neoplasias, 23 %) were detected by AFE but not by WLE. CONCLUSIONS: Although one quarter of elevated gastric neoplasias were detected only by AFE, its specificity is poor; therefore its clinical value is limited.

    Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Publishing Authors By Initials

    m katoM Kato,m kaiseM Kaise,j yonezawaJ Yonezawa,y yoshidaY Yoshida,h tajiriH Tajiri,m katoM Kato,m kaiseM Kaise,j yonezawaJ Yonezawa,y yoshidaY Yoshida,h tajiriH Tajiri,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Endoscopy

    VOLUME: 39

    Page Numbers: 937-41

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1438-8812

    DAY: 16

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 2007

    Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 215166

    Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

    Country: Germany

    Germany Research PublicationGermany Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Endoscopy

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News