Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

[Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks]

[Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Abstract Text:

    OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to evaluate agreement between anesthesiologists' location of specific anatomical landmarks in regional anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We administered an anonymous written questionnaire asking for the location of the T5 and T10 dermatomes, Tuffier's line (L3-L4 space), and the T7-T8 and C6-C7 spaces on an anatomical drawing. We asked about each anesthesiologist's number of years of experience and type of block most commonly performed and in what type of surgery, number of blocks performed per year, whether or not levels of sensory and motor blocks were assessed, and whether training had been received. Relative frequencies were then calculated. The relationships between years of experience and number of blocks performed and number of correct identifications of anatomical points were analyzed using the chi2 test. RESULTS: We studied 100 doctors (66 residents and 24 staff anesthesiologists). The landmark for which agreement was highest was T10 (91.8%); agreement was lowest for T5 (38.1%). Forty-five percent of anesthesiologists performed between 100 and 250 neuraxial blocks per year. The most commonly performed procedure was a lumbar block (98% of the anesthesiologists). Level of sensory block was evaluated by 95% of the respondents and level of motor block by 83%. Response to heat and cold was used by 94.8%; the Bromage scale was used by 81%. The number of years of experience and the number of correctly located points appeared to be unrelated (P=.76). Nor was there a correlation between the number of blocks performed and number of correctly located points (P=.2). CONCLUSIONS: T10 was the landmark correctly identified by the largest number of respondents; T5 was correctly identified by the fewest respondents, with answers differing by as much as 4 dermatomes.

    [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Revista española de anestesiología y reanimación

    VOLUME: 55

    Page Numbers: 144-50

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0034-9356

    DAY: 11

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 2008

    [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: spa

    NlmUniqueID: 134516

    [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks] Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for [Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks]

    AFFILIATION: Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa,. Madrid.

    Country: Spain

    Spain Research PublicationSpain Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Assessment of agreement between anesthesiologists' location of anatomical landmarks Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum