Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems.

Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Abstract Text:

    j j callaghanJ J Callaghan,s h dysartS H Dysart,c f savoryC F Savory,w j hopkinsonW J Hopkinson,

    One hundred hips in patients who had had primary uncemented replacements were followed up for one or two years, and assessed by five different methods. All produced different results. The Hospital for Special Surgery rating produced the most optimistic assessment and the Merle d'Aubigné rating the most pessimistic. The functional class of the patients, as defined by Charnley in 1979, significantly affected the ratings, and these should clearly be included in all rating systems. Moreover, if systems are to be compared, they should all use descriptive words, such as limp or pain, in precisely the same way.

    Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Publishing Authors By Initials

    jj callaghanJJ Callaghan,sh dysartSH Dysart,cf savoryCF Savory,wj hopkinsonWJ Hopkinson,

    For similar investigative techniques: equipment design: prosthesis design research abstracts see: investigative techniques: equipment design: prosthesis design research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British vol

    VOLUME: 72

    Page Numbers: 1008-9

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0301-620X

    DAY: 14

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 1990

    Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 375355

    Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Prosthesis Design

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems.

    AFFILIATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington.

    Country: ENGLAND

    ENGLAND Research PublicationENGLAND Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Bone Joint Surg Br

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Assessing the results of hip replacement A comparison of five different rating systems Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News