Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests.

Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Abstract Text:

    The purpose of this study was to compare a recently developed response-inhibition task (Conners, 1995) to slow- and fast-event-rate versions of the traditional A-X Continuous Performance Test (CPT). Among 146 normal adults, results revealed significant differences between tasks in omission and commission error rates, reaction time, reaction time variability, and responses to critical signals. Effects of environmental noise and participant anxiety also differed for the three tasks. Traditional CPTs produced time-related performance decrements, but the response-inhibition task produced improvement across initial blocks of trials. The response-inhibition task may measure "executive control" rather than sustained attention, and therefore may represent functions of different brain systems.

    Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar psychological phenomena and processes: psychomotor performance research abstracts see: psychological phenomena and processes: psychomotor performance research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsycholo

    VOLUME: 23

    Page Numbers: 331-50

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1380-3395

    DAY: 14

    MONTH: Jun

    YEAR: 2001

    Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8502170

    Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Psychomotor Performance

    MESH TERMS: adverse effects

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Psychology, State University of New York, College at Geneseo, NY 14454, USA. ballard@geneseo.edu

    Country: Netherlands

    Netherlands Research PublicationNetherlands Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Assessing attention: comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News