Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis.

Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Abstract Text:

    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the applicability of process-of-care quality indicators (QIs) to vulnerable elders and to measure the effect of excluding indicators based on patients' preferences and for advanced dementia and poor prognosis. DESIGN: The Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) project employed 203 QIs for care of 22 conditions (including six geriatric syndromes and 11 age-associated diseases) for community-based persons aged 65 and older at increased risk of functional decline or death. Relevant QIs were excluded for persons deciding against hospitalization or surgery. A 12-member clinical committee (CC) of geriatric experts rated whether each QI should be applied in scoring quality of care for persons with advanced dementia (AdvDem) or poor prognosis (PoorProg). Using content analysis, CC ratings were formulated into a model of QI exclusion. Quality scores with and without excluded QIs were compared. SETTING: Enrollees in two senior managed care plans, one in the northeast United States and the other in the southwest. PARTICIPANTS: CC members evaluated applicability of QIs. QIs were applied to 372 vulnerable elders in two senior managed care plans. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and type of QIs excluded and the effect of excluding QIs on quality of care scores. RESULTS: Of the 203 QIs, a patient's preference against hospitalization or surgery excluded 10 and eight QIs, respectively. The CC voted to exclude 81.5 QIs (40%) for patients with AdvDem and 70 QIs (34%) for patients with PoorProg. Content analysis of the CC votes revealed that QIs aimed at care coordination, safety or prevention of decline, or short-term clinical improvement or prevention with nonburdensome interventions were usually voted for inclusion (90% and 98% included for AdvDem and PoorProg, respectively), but QIs directed at long-term benefit or requiring interventions of moderate to heavy burden were usually excluded (16% and 19% included, respectively). About half of QIs aimed at age-associated diseases were voted for exclusion, whereas fewer than one-quarter of QIs for geriatric syndromes were excluded. Thirty-nine patients (10%) in our field trial held preferences or had clinical conditions that would have excluded 68 QIs. This accounted for 5% of all QIs triggered by these 39 patients and 0.6% of QIs overall. The quality score without exclusion was 0.57 and with exclusion was 0.58 (P =.89). CONCLUSION: Caution is required in applying QIs to vulnerable elders. QIs for geriatric syndromes are more likely to be applicable to these individuals than are QIs for age-associated diseases. The objectives of care, intervention burdens, and interval before anticipated benefit affect QI applicability. At least for patients with AdvDem and PoorProg, identification of applicable or inapplicable QIs is feasible. In a community-based sample of vulnerable elders, few QIs are excluded.

    Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar persons: vulnerable populations research abstracts see: persons: vulnerable populations research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    VOLUME: 51

    Page Numbers: 902-7

    Journal Abbreviation: J Am Geriatr Soc

    ISSN: 0002-8614

    DAY: 10

    MONTH: Jul

    YEAR: 2003

    Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7503062

    Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Vulnerable Populations

    MESH TERMS: therapy

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis.

    AFFILIATION: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA. dsolomon1@earthlink.net

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Am Geriatr Soc

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News