Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier.

An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Abstract Text:

    bahareh fathiBahareh Fathi,james bahcallJames Bahcall,james s makiJames S Maki,

    The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate quantitatively the effectiveness of three different restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier to prevent microleakage of endodontically treated teeth. Fifty-five extracted human single-canal teeth were used in this study. The teeth were endodontically prepared and obturated. Forty-five teeth were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: group 1: sealed with Ketac-Cem (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN) (n = 15), group 2: sealed with Clearfil Protect Bond/Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray, New York, NY) (n = 15), and group 3: sealed with Maxcem (Kerr, Orange, CA) (n = 15). Ten teeth were also randomly assigned to a negative control group (n = 5) and a positive control group (n = 5). Microleakage was tested by using a sterile two-chamber bacterial method and Enterococcus faecalis was used as a microbial marker. Samples were incubated aerobically at 37 degrees C for 120 days. Bacterial leakage was determined by change in turbidity in the medium. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wald chi-square test. No significant difference (p > 0.05) in bacterial leakage was found between the three experimental groups tested. All positive controls leaked within 60 days and broth of the negative control group remained clear throughout the entire experimental period.

    An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Publishing Authors By Initials

    b fathiB Fathi,j bahcallJ Bahcall,js makiJS Maki,

    For similar zinc oxide research abstracts see: zinc oxide research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Journal: Journal of endodontics

    VOLUME: 33

    Page Numbers: 872-4

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0099-2399

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: 04

    YEAR: 2007

    An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7511484

    An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Zinc Oxide

    MESH TERMS: chemistry

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier. Information

    Substance Name: Ketac-cem

    Registry Number: 86473-14-5

    Grant and Affiliation Information for An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Graduate Endodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA. baharehfathi@gmail.com

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Endod

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    An in vitro comparison of bacterial leakage of three common restorative materials used as an intracoronal barrier Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News