Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.

An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Abstract Text:

    m bresnihanM Bresnihan,b mehiganB Mehigan,a curranA Curran,m bresnihanM Bresnihan,b mehiganB Mehigan,a curranA Curran,

    OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain levels between Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs. DESIGN: A prospective randomised, single blind, paired control trial. SETTING: A single consultant in two tertiary Otolaryngology units. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four adults, ASA 1, who underwent septoplasty, endoscopic sinus surgery or both, were considered after exclusion criteria were applied: bleeding abnormalities, patients taking anticoagulant medications and any significant co-morbidity requiring admission beyond 24-h postoperatively. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to have one side of their nose packed with Merocel pack and the other with Series 5000 overnight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference in pain levels, using a visual analogue scale, both with the pack in situ and on removal. RESULTS: In 20 patients, the mean pain scores while the packs were in situ were 3.78 for Merocel and 3.62 for Series 5000 and was not found to be significantly different (P = 0.65. 95% CI = -0.57-0.89). The mean pain score on removal of the Merocel pack was five and for the Series 5000 was 3.08. The Series 5000 pack was significantly less painful than Merocel on removal (P < 0.0001. 95% CI = 1.11-2.7). Both were equally effective in their stability and haemostatic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Merocel and Series 5000 packs are effective packs regarding haemostasis and have equivalent pain levels while in situ. However, the Series 5000 pack was significantly less painful on removal of the pack.

    An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Publishing Authors By Initials

    m bresnihanM Bresnihan,b mehiganB Mehigan,a curranA Curran,m bresnihanM Bresnihan,b mehiganB Mehigan,a curranA Curran,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-

    VOLUME: 32

    Page Numbers: 352-5

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1749-4478

    DAY: 21

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101247023

    An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.

    AFFILIATION: Department of ENT, St Vincents University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. marybresnihan@rcsi.ie

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Clin Otolaryngol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News