Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse.

An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Abstract Text:

    mary pillaiMary Pillai,mary pillaiMary Pillai,mary pillaiMary Pillai,

    Fourteen cases of alleged child sexual abuse, where the medical opinion rated a high degree of concordance with the history or suspicion of abuse given to the doctor, were reviewed to evaluate the objectivity and reliability of the medical evidence. It was common practice for physicians conducting the medical examination to form conclusions that the child had been sexually abused on the basis of the examiner's willingness to accept statements by the child, the adolescent, the caregiver or the investigator without determining if this information was accurate and obtained through the use of appropriate interviewing techniques. In the prepubertal children, evaluation of the examination findings revealed anatomical descriptions that were normal or non-specific, rather than supportive of abuse. In the teenagers, inadequate consideration was made of the behavioural and physical differences that occur with adolescence. The physical findings were not interpreted using research derived knowledge concerning the variations of "normal" and the particular conditions that may be mistaken as abuse. The medical reports of these examinations suggest to this author a possibility of the significance and relevance of physical findings being unduly and unwittingly over-emphasised, despite the cases all having occurred post the Cleveland Inquiry [Butler Sloss E. Report into the Child Abuse Enquiry in Cleveland, 1987. London, HMSO] and some as recently as 2005. This may reflect emotional involvement in the case and the doctor taking on a role of advocacy for the child. It is sometimes difficult for physicians to step out of the medical role where they do have the responsibility to diagnose and into a role where their information is only a piece of the puzzle and it is the work of the court to determine if sexual abuse has occurred. The role confusion between medicine and forensics must be sorted out in order for physicians to provide an objective assessment. The main conclusion of this paper is that it identifies significant training needs among doctors undertaking child examinations for suspected sexual abuse.

    An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Publishing Authors By Initials

    m pillaiM Pillai,m pillaiM Pillai,m pillaiM Pillai,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of forensic and legal medicine

    VOLUME: 14

    Page Numbers: 503-14

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1752-928X

    DAY: 28

    MONTH: 03

    YEAR: 2007

    An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101300022

    An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse.

    AFFILIATION: Cheltenham General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sandford Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, United Kingdom.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Forensic Leg Med

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    An evaluation of 'confirmatory' medical opinion given to English courts in 14 cases of alleged child sexual abuse Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News