Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation.

Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Abstract Text:

    nathalie m danjouxNathalie M Danjoux,douglas k martinDouglas K Martin,pascale n lehouxPascale N Lehoux,julie l harnishJulie L Harnish,randi zlotnik shaulRandi Zlotnik Shaul,mark bernsteinMark Bernstein,david r urbachDavid R Urbach,nathalie m danjouxNathalie M Danjoux,douglas k martinDouglas K Martin,pascale n lehouxPascale N Lehoux,julie l harnishJulie L Harnish,randi zlotnik shaulRandi Zlotnik Shaul,mark bernsteinMark Bernstein,david r urbachDavid R Urbach,

    BACKGROUND: Priority setting in health care is a challenge because demand for services exceeds available resources. The increasing demand for less invasive surgical procedures by patients, health care institutions and industry, places added pressure on surgeons to acquire the appropriate skills to adopt innovative procedures. Such innovations are often initiated and introduced by surgeons in the hospital setting. Decision-making processes for the adoption of surgical innovations in hospitals have not been well studied and a standard process for their introduction does not exist. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate the decision-making process for the adoption of a new technology for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR]) in an academic health sciences centre to better understand how decisions are made for the introduction of surgical innovations at the hospital level. METHODS: A qualitative case study of the decision to adopt EVAR was conducted using a modified thematic analysis of documents and semi-structured interviews. Accountability for Reasonableness was used as a conceptual framework for fairness in priority setting processes in health care organizations. RESULTS: There were two key decisions regarding EVAR: the decision to adopt the new technology in the hospital and the decision to stop hospital funding. The decision to adopt EVAR was based on perceived improved patient outcomes, safety, and the surgeons' desire to innovate. This decision involved very few stakeholders. The decision to stop funding of EVAR involved all key players and was based on criteria apparent to all those involved, including cost, evidence and hospital priorities. Limited internal communications were made prior to adopting the technology. There was no formal means to appeal the decisions made. CONCLUSION: The analysis yielded recommendations for improving future decisions about the adoption of surgical innovations. ese empirical findings will be used with other case studies to help develop guidelines to help decision-makers adopt surgical innovations in Canadian hospitals.

    Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Publishing Authors By Initials

    nm danjouxNM Danjoux,dk martinDK Martin,pn lehouxPN Lehoux,jl harnishJL Harnish,rz shaulRZ Shaul,m bernsteinM Bernstein,dr urbachDR Urbach,nm danjouxNM Danjoux,dk martinDK Martin,pn lehouxPN Lehoux,jl harnishJL Harnish,rz shaulRZ Shaul,m bernsteinM Bernstein,dr urbachDR Urbach,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: BMC health services research

    VOLUME: 7

    Page Numbers: 182

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1472-6963

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: 11

    YEAR: 2007

    Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101088677

    Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. nathalie.danjoux@utoronto.ca

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: BMC Health Serv Res

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News