Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection.

A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Abstract Text:

    m M ,b schaerB Schaer,c kaufmannC Kaufmann,n moulayN Moulay,t cronT Cron,t cueniT Cueni,p weissP Weiss,c schindlerC Schindler,c sticherlingC Sticherling,s osswaldS Osswald,m M ,b schaerB Schaer,c kaufmannC Kaufmann,n moulayN Moulay,t cronT Cron,t cueniT Cueni,p weissP Weiss,c schindlerC Schindler,c sticherlingC Sticherling,s osswaldS Osswald,

    Aims DDD-pacemakers are favoured in patients with sick-sinus-syndrome or AV-block. However, AAI-pacemakers for sick-sinus-syndrome or VDD-pacemakers for AV-block may provide similar benefit with lower costs. The aim is to show that a tailored approach (TA) with arrhythmia-specific pacemaker selection was equal to a standard approach (SA) regarding quality of life (QoL) at lower costs. Methods and results The study was prospective and randomized with QoL as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, worsening heart failure or angina, atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, these endpoints individually and costs. Of 198 patients (age 77 +/- 10 years, 43% female, ejection fraction 54 +/- 12%, follow-up 38 +/- 15 months), 94 were randomized to SA and 104 to TA. Thirty-two patients (34%) died in the SA group vs. 25 (24%) in the TA (P= ns). QoL showed no differences in all dimensions. The combined secondary endpoint was reached more frequently with SA (51%) compared to TA (37%, P = 0.045). There was no difference regarding all single secondary endpoints. Hardware costs were reduced by 15% (P < 0.0001). Conclusion In long-term follow-up, a TA is equal to SA regarding the primary endpoint QoL and secondary endpoints as AF and mortality. Depending on the healthcare system, it may significantly reduce costs.

    A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Publishing Authors By Initials

    m M ,b schaerB Schaer,c kaufmannC Kaufmann,n moulayN Moulay,t cronT Cron,t cueniT Cueni,p weissP Weiss,c schindlerC Schindler,c sticherlingC Sticherling,s osswaldS Osswald,m M ,b schaerB Schaer,c kaufmannC Kaufmann,n moulayN Moulay,t cronT Cron,t cueniT Cueni,p weissP Weiss,c schindlerC Schindler,c sticherlingC Sticherling,s osswaldS Osswald,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardi

    VOLUME: 9

    Page Numbers: 1185-90

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1099-5129

    DAY: 19

    MONTH: 10

    YEAR: 2007

    A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 100883649

    A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection.

    AFFILIATION: Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Europace

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    A randomized trial comparing two different approaches of pacemaker selection Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News