Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Abstract Text:

    mikkael a sekeresMikkael A Sekeres,alex z fuAlex Z Fu,jaroslaw p maciejewskiJaroslaw P Maciejewski,ali-reza golshayanAli-Reza Golshayan,matt e kalaycioMatt E Kalaycio,michael w kattanMichael W Kattan,

    BACKGROUND: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are divided into low-risk and high-risk diseases. Predictive models for response to growth factors (GF) have been developed based on red blood cell transfusion needs and erythropoietin levels. For low-risk MDS the optimal initial therapy (GF vs nongrowth factor [NGF] therapies, including differentiation and immunomodulatory agents) based on response rates to NGF and GF and survival, has not been defined. METHODS: A Markov decision analysis was performed on 799 low-risk MDS patients treated with either GF or NGF to determine the appropriate initial therapy. The treatment strategies analyzed included initial GF or NGF therapies, assuming 3 different states: Patients were either in the good GF predictive group (low transfusion needs and low erythropoietin levels), intermediate, or the poor GF predictive group (high transfusion needs and high erythropoietin levels). RESULTS: In the good GF predictive group, initial therapy with GF improved survival compared with NGF therapies at 3.38 years vs 2.57 years for a typical MDS patient. The advantage of GF to NGF was lost when NGF therapies produced a response in >or=46% of patients. In the intermediate or poor GF predictive groups, NGF maximized survival, provided response rates for NGF were >14% and 4%, respectively, for each predictive group. Quality of life adjustment did not alter the preferred strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling estimates suggest that patients who fall into a good GF predictive group should almost always receive GF initially, whereas those in intermediate and poor predictive groups should almost always be treated with NGF.

    A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ma sekeresMA Sekeres,az fuAZ Fu,jp maciejewskiJP Maciejewski,ar golshayanAR Golshayan,me kalaycioME Kalaycio,mw kattanMW Kattan,

    For similar diagnosis: prognosis: treatment outcome research abstracts see: diagnosis: prognosis: treatment outcome research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: Cancer

    VOLUME: 109

    Page Numbers: 1125-32

    Journal Abbreviation: Cancer

    ISSN: 0008-543X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 2007

    A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 374236

    A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Treatment Outcome

    MESH TERMS: therapeutic use

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Information

    Substance Name: Nerve Growth Factors

    Registry Number: 0

    Grant and Affiliation Information for A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. sekerem@ccf.org

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NCRR

    GRANT: U54RR19397-03

    ACRONYM: RR

    MEDLINETA: Cancer

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    A Decision analysis to determine the appropriate treatment for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News