Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals.

A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Abstract Text:

    peter cramPeter Cram,mary s vaughan-sarrazinMary S Vaughan-Sarrazin,brian wolfBrian Wolf,jeffrey n katzJeffrey N Katz,gary e rosenthalGary E Rosenthal,

    BACKGROUND: The emergence of specialty orthopaedic hospitals has generated widespread controversy, but little is known about the quality of care they deliver. Our objective was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing major joint replacement in specialty orthopaedic and general hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 51,788 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent total hip replacement and 99,765 who underwent total knee replacement in thirty-eight specialty orthopaedic hospitals and 517 general hospitals between 1999 and 2003. We compared demographic data, rates of comorbid illness, and socioeconomic status of patients treated in specialty and general hospitals. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of an adverse outcome (death or selected surgical complications) after adjustment for patient characteristics and hospital procedural volume. RESULTS: The demographic data and the ratio of primary to revision arthroplasties were similar, but patients who received care in specialty hospitals had less comorbidity and resided in more affluent zip codes than their counterparts in general hospitals in 2003. Specialty hospitals had significantly greater mean procedural volumes in 2003 than did general hospitals for both total hip replacement (thirty-three compared with twenty procedures; p = 0.05) and total knee replacement (seventy-five compared with forty procedures; p = 0.006). The unadjusted rate of adverse outcomes was lower in specialty hospitals than in general hospitals for total hip replacement (3.0% compared with 6.9%; p < 0.001) and total knee replacement (2.1% compared with 3.9%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics and procedural volume, the odds of adverse outcomes occurring were significantly lower for patients in specialty hospitals than for those in general hospitals for both primary joint replacement (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.75; p < 0.001) and revision joint replacement (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.66; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for patient characteristics and hospital volume, the specialty orthopaedic hospitals had better patient outcomes, as measured by Medicare administrative data, than did the general hospitals.

    A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Publishing Authors By Initials

    p cramP Cram,ms vaughan-sarrazinMS Vaughan-Sarrazin,b wolfB Wolf,jn katzJN Katz,ge rosenthalGE Rosenthal,

    For similar geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research abstracts see: geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, U.S. Gov't,

    Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American vo

    VOLUME: 89

    Page Numbers: 1675-84

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0021-9355

    DAY: 3

    MONTH: Aug

    YEAR: 2007

    A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 14030

    A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: United States

    MESH TERMS: epidemiology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals.

    AFFILIATION: Division of General Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. peter-cram@uiowa.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NCRR

    GRANT: K23 RR01997201

    ACRONYM: RR

    MEDLINETA: J Bone Joint Surg Am

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News