Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae.

A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Abstract Text:

    i s taubitzI S Taubitz,h brandisH Brandis,

    Seven methods of serotyping of Haemophilus influenzae were evaluated. Comparing slide agglutination, staphylococcal coagglutination, latex agglutination, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, immunofluorescence, capsular swelling, and cultivation on antiserum agar the commercial coagglutination test was most reliable, most rapid, and easiest to perform. To identify all six serotypes this coagglutination test had to be combined with slide agglutination. With most methods best results were achieved by using cultures incubated at 37 degrees C for 6 h. As nonencapsulated strains often agglutinated unspecifically, selection of probably typeable strains was useful. Differentiation with help of colonial morphology and opalescent growth was facilitated by cultivation on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) Chocolate Agar and testing of growth factor requirements on translucent BHI Agar with strips containing the growth factors V, X, and VX, respectively. In broth turbid growth was a hint for encapsulation. Nigrosin staining, a negative capsule staining, proved to be useful if specific antisera are not available. From 252 clinical isolates of H. influenzae 216 were not typeable. 36 strains could be serotyped. 27 (75%) belonged to serotype b, 6 (16.6%) were serotype e, 3 (8.3%) were serotype f. Serotype e and f were most difficult to identify. Spectrum of patients and diseases were corresponding to the findings of other authors. Less well-known infections like cellulitis (erysipelas of the cheeks) and arthritis were observed, too. Rapid identification of at least H. influenzae type b could render treatment in some cases more effective by early application of a suitable antibiotic.

    A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Publishing Authors By Initials

    is taubitzIS Taubitz,h brandisH Brandis,

    For similar diagnosis: laboratory techniques and procedures: immunologic tests: serotyping research abstracts see: diagnosis: laboratory techniques and procedures: immunologic tests: serotyping research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie, und

    VOLUME: 270

    Page Numbers: 83-97

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0176-6724

    DAY: 12

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 1988

    A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8403032

    A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Serotyping

    MESH TERMS: ultrastructure

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Information

    Substance Name: Culture Media

    Registry Number: 0

    Grant and Affiliation Information for A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae.

    AFFILIATION: Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie der Universität Bonn.

    Country: GERMANY, WEST

    GERMANY, WEST Research PublicationGERMANY, WEST Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    A comparison between methods of identification and serotyping of encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News