Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Abstract Text:

    abdoulrasol mehrsaiAbdoulrasol Mehrsai,d mansooriD Mansoori,mohammad taheri mahmoudiMohammad Taheri Mahmoudi,alireza sinaAlireza Sina,a serajiA Seraji,gholamreza pourmandGholamreza Pourmand,

    Introduction: To determine the accuracy of clinical staging methods of bladder cancer and TURBT results in estimating the pathologic stage of tumor.Materials and Methods: Thirty two patients who had undergone radical cystectomy were studied in this retrospective survey. The results of bimanual examination, cystoscopy, TURBT pathology report and the tumor contour in CT scan, (size, infiltrative deepness, pelvic lymph nodes involvement and hydronephrosis) were recorded. The type of surgery and pathologic report of cystectomy sample were analyzed as well. Then the results of bimanual examination, tumor size, hydronephrosis and CT scan findings including tumor infiltrative deepness, pelvic lymph adenopathy and TURBT findings were compared to pathologic results of cystectomy sample.Results: Seven patients were females and 25 were males. Their mean age was 62 (range 36 to 80) years. Gross hematuria and irritative urinary symptoms were the most common complaints. The duration between symptom manifestation and patient's referral was 5 days to 72 months (mean 12 months). Bimanual examination in estimating the extravesical involvement of tumor had a specificity of 82%, sensitivity of 46%, positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 63%. The size of tumor in determining extravesical involvement had a specificity of 41%, sensitivity of 93%, and positive predictive value of 58% and negative predictive value of 87%. Hydronephrosis was present in 15 patients of whom, 14(93%) had bladder muscle involvement. CT scan specificity was 70%, and sensitivity was 46% regarding pelvic lymph adenopathy and perivesical fat involvement. In TURBT report no muscle sample was observed in 11 cases, so that the interpretations of results were impossible. The reported grade of tumor was lower than pathologic sample of cystectomy in 4 patients. Conclusion: Clinical staging in invasive bladder cancers has not high accuracy regarding the involvement of bladder surrounding fats and pelvic adenopathies. A tumor sized more than 5 cm could be sensitive in estimating extravesical involvement. Positive predictive value of hydronephrosis is considerable regarding bladder muscle involvement. Tumor understaging by TURBT is happened in high percentage of patients with invasive bladder cancer.

    A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Publishing Authors By Initials

    a mehrsaiA Mehrsai,d mansooriD Mansoori,m taheri mahmoudiM Taheri Mahmoudi,a sinaA Sina,a serajiA Seraji,g pourmandG Pourmand,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Urology journal

    VOLUME: 1

    Page Numbers: 85-9

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1735-1308

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: 09

    YEAR: 2004

    A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101286676

    A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Urology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

    Country: Iran

    Iran Research PublicationIran Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Urol J

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    A Comparison between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Patients with Bladder Cancer Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News