If you take the moral dilemma outside of embryonic stem cell vs. adult stem cell, is one really better than the other scientifically speaking.
I have been doing a lot of research on stem cell, and one think I seems to always come across is article stating adult stem cell are better than embryonic stem cell. I'm looking for confirmation on these claims from a real credible source.
First there is a claim that adult stem cell have successfully treated 65 diseases and illness.
Second, a lot of people are saying that adult stem cell have will produce real result, whereas embryonic have a lot of promise, but it hasn't produce any real break through over the years. Some have say that embryonic stem cell research has been legalized in many countries outside the U.S. and they still hasn't made any real progress
Some have say that adult stem cell have head start in development, some sources dated adult stem cell research back to the 1940. What is the correct years when adult stem cell research begin?
If adult stem cell have the potential to cure so many disease, and adult stem cell was once embryonic stem cell, doesn't it follow that embryonic stem cell have as much potential as adult stem cell.
Again, I understand that adult stem cell is may be more favorable because it doesn't involve destroying a embryo. But please attempt to take this fact out of consideration, and just answer if scientifically speaking, adult stem cell are better\worse\the same as embryonic stem cell.