Molecular Biology Forums

 

Go Back   Molecular Biology Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Cell Biology and Cell Culture > Signalling Biology
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Signalling Biology Signalling is an integral part of the cell neural network. Phosphorylation and other protein modifications modulate this interaction. Post and discuss the study of protein-protein interactions, and signalling biology protocols and science here.


assessing p-ERK levels after mitogenic stimulation

Signalling Biology

Signalling is an integral part of the cell neural network. Phosphorylation and other protein modifications modulate this interaction. Post and discuss the study of protein-protein interactions, and signalling biology protocols and science here.



Register Molecular Biology Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2007, 11:54 AM
mickey07 mickey07 is offline
Pipette Filler
Points: 536, Level: 10Points: 536, Level: 10Points: 536, Level: 10
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
mickey07 RSS Feed
Default assessing p-ERK levels after mitogenic stimulation

Hi All

I want to look at the level of phosphorylation of p-ERK (p44 MAPK) after mitogenic stimulation. I am using the p-ERK and total ERK antibodies from Cell Signaling. My problem is that I wish to use the same membrane to assess the levels of both these proteins, but I am experiencing difficulties with stripping membranes (loosing proteins) and not getting good signal afterwards. I have tried different methods of stripping as well alternating these antibodies before stripping , but to no avail. I know that to assess the phospho levels of ERK, conventionally, one need to probe for both p-ERK and total ERK and then determine the p-ERK/t-ERK. My question is whether it would be acceptible to determine the level of phosphorylation in my mitogen treated samples compared to my control, which is untreated sample (t0) and normalising to a housekeeping protein, eg, GAPDH, rather than using the p-ERK/T-ERK ratio. Thanks in advance for any advice.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising
Google Adsense
 
This advertising will not be shown
in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today
and become a member on
Molecular Biology Forum
Standard Sponsored Links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2007, 12:54 PM
oBWhat's Avatar
oBWhat oBWhat is offline
Graduate Student
Points: 2,599, Level: 32Points: 2,599, Level: 32Points: 2,599, Level: 32
Activity: 100%Activity: 100%Activity: 100%
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
Blog Entries: 1
oBWhat RSS Feed
Default Re: assessing p-ERK levels after mitogenic stimulation

Hello,

are you stripping your blots after you blot for phospho-proteins? that would be your best bet, blot for phospho-proteins and then strip the membrane to blot for total protein.

If you are doing that, or need to strip more then you need to load more protein or strip less.
Either that, or you can do multiple blots with more than 1 primary.
I have done that before.

Anyone else care to comment?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2007, 12:46 PM
mickey07 mickey07 is offline
Pipette Filler
Points: 536, Level: 10Points: 536, Level: 10Points: 536, Level: 10
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
mickey07 RSS Feed
Default Re: assessing p-ERK levels after mitogenic stimulation

Thanks for your reply oBWhat

I have tried blotting for both phospho and total proteins first. The reason for trying total ERK first, is that the antibody does not bind as strongly to its target epitope as the phospho ERK does , therefore I could use a mild stripping agent (0.2N NaOH, 5 min.) to remove the total ERK antibodies. I have checked the blots after stripping this way, and have succeeded to remove the total ERK antibody completely. When I blotted for p-ERK first, I used b-mercaptoethanol(30 min. at variuos temperatures) and managed to remove the p-ERK antibodies. However, no matter which stripping agent I used, I always get the same result: the proteins in the middle of the blot is fainter than the edges. So, I tried shaking only occasionally, and the result was the same. I could try stripping less, but I guess my best bet, as you suggested, is then to run multiple blots and use different primaries. Thnaks again for your advice.
Ciao
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2007 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved