| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis Forum SDS-PAGE Forum and Gel Electrophoresis Forum. Discuss the running of agarose gels, sds-page gels, and other gels including sequencing, gradient or tricine. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| i hate boiling my samples as i get aggregates of proteins running near the top of the gels. also if you are using specific dyes/probes etc you want hooked to the protein, boiling kills/knocks off these guys.....is there any way to not boil your samples before sds page? |
|
#2
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| How about native PAGE (non-reducing conditions)? |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| So Far i could not find any alternative method of boiling in sample preparation for SDS-PAGE. if somebody know then he should share with us, so we can make a compartive analysis of both procedures. regards aftab |
|
#4
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| You could try just not boiling at all to see how the boiled sample compares with the unboiled sample. You could also heat your sample at 37 degrees Celsius for longer (maybe 10 minutes), so that your sample isn't actually boiling. Another possibility could be to include some urea (maybe like 2M) in the sample. |
|
#5
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Quote:
|
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| I have read somewhere boiling at 100 C is bad (most people set it at 100 on the heating block and 5 minutes!), and 91 C - 93 C is improved. Sorry I forgot which paper I read it but try it during your optimization. A few samples at 100 C and some at 90 - 93 C. Let us know what you get, I would actually use 91 C for 3 minutes. cheers |
|
#7
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| the aggregates appear even after centrifuge/spin down? i forgot to mention that u only take the supernatant right? maybe you can show us the gel and how does the aggregates look like. |
|
#8
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| "Membrane protein crystallization and purification", eds. C. Hunte, G. von Jagow, and H. Schaegger, pag.93 they suggest 40°C for 30', which I use also for the soluble fraction of my cells. Urea variates the molecular weights, at least to my knowledge. I hope it is useful! cheers |
| The Following User Says Thank You to lja For This Useful Post: | ||
kdwyer (05-01-2009)
| ||
|
#9
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| I do 96 degrees for 8 mins on the PCR thermocycler for my 96 wells =) works fine when i run 6 gels at a time |
|
#10
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Hello, As far as I know, boiling was introduced to combat proteolysis. The idea being that as SDS unfolds the proteins in the sample any protease there will have a 'field day' for the time spent at near optimum temperature with an unfolded substrate to act on. It is essential, therefore, to get the sample to a temperature where any proteases present are instantly inactivated. Probably, there is no need to go to 100 degrees C, but 40 degrees C for 30 min seems crazy to me, unless the risk of proteolysis can be completely excluded. For this reason also, you should always add HOT sample buffer to the sample, especially with crude extracts. There are a few other points. Do you centrifuge you samples prior to loading? This usually gets rid of precipitation. Do you have a stacker gel? It is not uncommon for high molecular weight proteins not to enter the gel. But if you have a stacker (say 4 percent or something like that) this is an unlikely explanation. Is there a lot of nucleic acid present? Are your samples 'gloopy'. If this is the case, you may need to sonicate. I suppose the answer is there is no need to boil, but beware of proteolysis Good luck, tgd |
| Tags |
| alternative , boiling , methods , samples , sds |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| molecular biology laboratory from scratch RE: Methods Digest, Vol 40,Issue 17 | Utsugi, Heidi K | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 09-23-2008 05:50 PM |
| Resource: Mass Spectrometry-based Methods of Proteome Analysis | danfive | Protein Science | 0 | 06-02-2008 08:03 PM |
| Methods Digest, Vol 34, Issue 23 | Protocols and Methods Forum | 1 | 03-27-2008 10:57 AM | |
| Methods Digest, Vol 17, Issue 23 | Sayyari, Mohammad | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 10-25-2006 09:11 AM |
| Methods Digest, Vol 3, Issue 4 | TieQiao Wu | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 08-05-2005 01:03 AM |