| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Science Groups New! | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| RNA Techniques Forum Post and discuss RNA methods and RNA science related topics. RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, RNA EMSA, and other RNA protocols. |
RNA Techniques Forum | |||
· · · RNA Pictures 6 photos 6 comments |
· · · RNA Pictures 6 photos 6 comments | ||
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
| ||||||
| Yes biotin-11-utp is almost as good. The 16/11 is a chemical spacer to try and allow binding to the ribonucleotides as the biotin is a large chemical group, as is known to inhibit binding of RNA protein molecules to the residues/binding sites on RNA. 11 would work just as fine as 16 spacers. |
| |||||
| I have a question: I'm doing EMSA RNA by using 2 very similar biotinylated RNA probes obtained with the Pierce EMSA Chemiluminescent Kit. Both probes are very similar in sequence and size. One is 160 bases long, the other one is 200 bases long. When I measure the amount of each by OD, I obtain a very similar value, indicating that the RNA amount in each condition is approx. the same. Based on this information, when I check them on native agarose gel using ethidium bromide, the amounts are completely different. The intensity of each band at UV light is 1 for the smaller (160) probe and 5 for the bigger (200) probe. Does anyone can help me to solve this problem? Since I need to compare the activity of both probes simultaneously, in the same gel, it is important for me to have the same amount for each probe……. Thanks a lot |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RNA Kit v.s. Trizol Method | c1bl | RNA Techniques Forum | 5 | 02-01-2008 07:28 PM |
| Biotin RNA EMSA Kit from Pierce | Med | RNA Techniques Forum | 4 | 06-06-2007 01:28 PM |