Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum > Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum


qPCR for ChIP quantification - cannot get nice standard curves.

qPCR for ChIP quantification - cannot get nice standard curves. - Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum

qPCR for ChIP quantification - cannot get nice standard curves. - Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2012, 12:46 PM
JWC JWC is offline
Pipette Filler
Points: 144, Level: 2 Points: 144, Level: 2 Points: 144, Level: 2
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default qPCR for ChIP quantification - cannot get nice standard curves.



Dear all,

I realise that standard curve questions are very common, but the majority of problems I have seen are to do with low efficiencies. I have the opposite problem - efficiencies of 200 or even 300% on standard curves.

Brief outline of my experiment:

in vivo ChIP using mouse embryos

1) Crosslink dissected embryos
2) Isolate and sonicate chromatin
3) Incubate with antibody + protein G magnetic beads
4) Wash beads and elute immunoprecipitated chromatin
5) Reverse crosslinks and purify chromatin
6) Quantify IP at sites of interest with SybrGreen qPCR

A) an "input" fraction of chromatin is taken from step 2, skips steps 3 and 4 and joins the other samples at step 5. This fraction is the reference for the qPCR and represents total genomic DNA.

I decided to run a standard curve for each set of primers using a serial dilution of the purified input fraction in order to estimate primer efficiencies for use in the Pffafl method. The standard curve started with 4ng of input DNA and consisted of 1:10 serial dilutions across a total of 7 orders of magnitude.

Unfortunately, the first four primers I tried on the standard curve produced slopes of around -1.5 to -1.8 which produces efficiences of around 250% to 350%. This is clearly very bad. This is the best of the standard curves so far (you'll have to remove the ***, I can't post full links as a new member): http:/***/postimage.org/image/csyl2mvs3/

I am using the standard cycling parameters on the ABI 7900HT (40 cycles of 15'' 95C, 1' 60C) and 250nM of each primer in a 10ul reaction mix with 2ul of DNA solution per reaction.

New primers are one suggestion I guess will come up, but the fact that 4 out of 4 primer pairs I have tried so far show this behaviour makes me suspicious. Does anyone have any advice for the painful process of extracting some meaningful data from these samples? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chip , curves , embryo , nice , primer efficiency , qpcr , quantification , standard , sybr


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
qPCR NEWS January 2009 - update in available real-time PCR cycler Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Protocols and Methods Forum 0 02-19-2009 11:04 AM
qPCR NEWS December 2008 Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Protocols and Methods Forum 0 12-17-2008 09:03 AM
qPCR newsletter August 2008 with focus on PCR efficiencydetermination Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Protocols and Methods Forum 0 08-14-2008 01:38 PM
qPCR Newsletter July 2008 - main focus on qPCR optimisation Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Protocols and Methods Forum 0 07-28-2008 02:48 PM
qPCR NEWSLETTER - September 2007 - qPCR 2007 talks online Editor www.Gene-Quantification.info Protocols and Methods Forum 0 09-25-2007 12:34 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.12228 seconds with 16 queries