| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Hello, I am new to Real time PCR work. My custom synthesized primer stock conc is 10nM (nanomoles) and would like to make my working stock conc of 300nMolar (nanomolar). can some one help me out to make my working conc. Thanks in advance |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| This is an easy calculation if you use the formula C1*V1 = C2*V2 where C is concentration in nM and V is volume in microlitres or nanolitres Also see this: PCR Primer Dilution Last edited by admin; 12-19-2010 at 01:20 PM. |
|
#3
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| thanks for message. My primers for real time PCR stock conc/Amount is 10nmol and I want make working conc for 300nM. I guess C1V1=C2V2 will not work here because my stock conc is in nMOl and working should be in nanoMolar My probe stock conc is 100 pmol/microlitre and want to make working conc for 100nM. please guide me in this regard thanks in advance |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi you can still do this by using a primer molecular weight calculator, using your sequence (input GCAT sequence) then you can calculate your needed concentration from the moles and calculated molecular weight. |
|
#5
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| I am confused about your working stock conc that primer was at 300nmol and probe at 100nmol, most working stock is from 5µm/µl to 40µm/ul, did you mean the final primer/probe reaction conc( add 0.5ul primer or probe to 25ul final reaction), if so, you should make primer working conc as 15µm/ul and probe as 5µm/ul, add 100µl water to your original stock conc primer (10nmol) to gain 100µmol Further Stock Conc (FSC) primer, then dilute 15µl FSC primer into 85µl water to gain 15µm/ul. dilute your stock conc probe as 20 times to gain 5µm/ul working conc probe. Last edited by namishu95; 12-22-2010 at 02:59 PM. |
| Tags |
| dilution , pcr , real , time |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| the absolutely final complete collection of ideas | blochee | Physics Forum | 2 | 06-15-2007 06:31 AM |
| Does any of this make sense ??? | Yrael | Physics Forum | 3 | 09-12-2005 03:11 AM |
| Relativists have never answered this question | Robert Calvert | Physics Forum | 84 | 12-17-2003 07:11 PM |
| The Law of Moving Dimenstions? Is The Time Dimension Moving Relative To Spatial Dimensions? | Ranger West | Physics Forum | 3 | 11-26-2003 10:39 PM |
| The Law of Moving Dimenstions: Time Dimension is Moving Relative To Spatial Dimension | Ranger West | Physics Forum | 6 | 11-12-2003 12:34 AM |