| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hello everyone, while measuring in sub mg quantities of a precious reagent (dry powder) I could not keep it at one place due to static and the reagent would go everywhere but down on the weighing boat. is there any way to avoid this. thank you. sincerely, Anwar Khan |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dear Anwar, let me suggest to do it by difference: weigh the vial with the substance and with lid and stoppers etc, then dissolve it, remove the solution, let the vial dry and weigh again with all parts. Then calculate the difference. Another possibility would be measuring the concentration by spectrophotometry, if extinction coefficients are available. A third possibility is to believe the manufacturer and just assume what's printed on the label... All the best, Wo On Mar 23, 8:45 pm, "Anwar Khan" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Anwar Khan wrote: In such cases I just trust the manufacturers statement of weight and add water to the vial directly to make a stock solution. That I then aliquote and snap-freeze. With some substances you can measure the concentration of the stock solution (i.e. absorbance or fluorescence measurements), just as a sanity-check. Note that with most balances you get 0.1 mg precision, so weighing sub-mg amounts gives you an error of > 10%. On top of that you get the error from trying to get the weighted substance into solution completely. Together that's much larger than the error a reputable manufacturer may have made. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ]>, Dr Engelbert Buxbaum <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: 100% seconded! When they say it's a mg, just assume it is. Add solvent, close the original vial, vorted very, very thouroughly, spin down, collect. And keep in mind that if the conclusion of the work include hard numbers, those numbers are +/- 10% at least. But with many things you can simply determine concentration of the resulting stock using a spec. DK |
| Tags |
| adivse , difficult , due , reagents , static , weighing |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|