| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hello everybody! I'm having problems with transfecting melanoma cells with vector containing dsRed fused to my protein of interest. I'm using Fugene 6 and get 60-70% efficiency with vector-only control, but only 1-5% efficiency with my construct. The protein that I'm working on is pretty large (300 kDa). I'm getting really frustrated. Has anybody encountered similar problems? What can i do to improve the efficiency Thanks in advance Yulia <[Only registered users see links. ].net> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <mailman.60.1149185411.18505.methods@net.bio.net >, "Yulia Shifrin" <yulia24@gmail.com> wrote: Yulya, welcome to real life The thing is, no two proteins are the same. And different proteins behave differently. They have different steady state level of expression (a balance of transcription/translation and proteolysis/degradation). What you are describing is *not* proper estimate of transfection efficiency. You'd be better off co-transfecting two plasmids - one encoding plain RFP, another your protein. Then the readout of fluorescence will have more to do with transfection per se (and even then, it's perfectly possible that your protein influences RFP expression). If it's of any consolation, I had a case recently expressing two versions of a ~ 95K protein functional chunk. They differed in 2 kDa, yet shorter version expressed ~ 10X worse. - Dima |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ].net >, Yulia Shifrin <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: A couple of simple things that you've probably already thought of - (1) Have you repeated the vector prep? Different maxipreps, even using the same system, can give widely different efficiencies; that's the case even when the two preps seem to be the same in concentration and quality. (2) How stable is the protein you're interested in? If it's degraded rapidly, then the dsRed will also be degraded along with it and of course the intensity will be much, much lower. If you have antibodies to the protein you can immunoprecipitate (not western blot) using a short label to detect expression. I believe there are antibodies to dsRed as well, so you could IP with that as well. Good luck. Ian -- Ian York ([Only registered users see links. ]) <http://www.panix.com/~iayork/> "-but as he was a York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a very respectable Man." -Jane Austen, The History of England |
| Tags |
| control , efficiency , great , low , transfection , works |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What happens when I get lotsof different bands in my samples when my control works ok | eul | PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum | 1 | 11-08-2007 04:06 PM |
| New Transfection Technology (high efficiency) | LorenzoT | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 4 | 11-06-2006 09:22 AM |
| New Transfection Technology (high efficiency) | LorenzoT | Molecular Biology Techniques | 0 | 10-31-2006 03:03 PM |
| how do you improve transfection efficiency? really puzzled! | bb | Protocols and Methods Forum | 1 | 07-23-2005 04:12 PM |