| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, My name is Isaac, I just entered the field of biology. I have been trying to express human calmodulin in E.coli cells, and tried a binding assay for its activities but it doesn't work, can anyone give me some advices? My CaM extraction procedures: 1. express Calmodulin-CFP-GST fusion in DH5a, 37 degrees, HB broth+ampicillin for 24 hours. 2. I sonicated the cells in Tris buffer 3. I span down the cell debris, and take the lysate to check for CaM activity. What is the commonly used assay to test CaM binding to peptide? and how do we usually get CaM working? I sorta recall that CaM folds really well... so i don't think it would be a folding problem.. Thank you very much Isaac |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ]>, Isaac Li <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: I can't give you an advice but I can assure you with 100% confidence that calmodulin on its own expresses in E.coli very well and is perfectly soluble and active. Ah, so it's not calmodulin but Calmodulin-CFP-GST. Well, that's entirely different thing! A priori, any fusion protein is NOT supposed to have all properties of its components... CaM has very hundreds activities. What's your assay? DK |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi DK, thanks for your reply. I realize that fusion protein may be the problem, but it seems that CaM in fusions are quite robust in many biosensor cases, the CaM-CFP-GST construct binds to GST beads and expresses very well... All I want is to verify that my CaM binds to M13 in vitro at this stage. I have tried quite a few pull down assays, and none of them works... e.g. I saturated Histag-CaM to Ni beads, and threw GFP-M13 into the solution +Ca2+, there's no obvious pull down, but the GFP-M13 is strongly pulled down by commercial CaM beads... do you have any suggestions? Thanks a lot! Isaac DK wrote: |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your answer, if I just want to test the calmodulin function, what should I do? Isaac |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ]>, Isaac Li <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: Like I said, CaM has tons of functions and there are probably subtle differences between species. Simplest: CaM+EDTA runs differently on a SDS (!) gel gel than CaM + Ca2+. Since you have a fusion, you might not be able to detect such shift. If it's a real CaM, it must bind to phenyl-sepharose in strictly Ca-dependent manner. CaM activates cAMP-dependent PDE - this might be easy enough assay for you. |
| Tags |
| calmodulin , ecoli , expressed , work |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 08-01-2010 02:18 PM |
| Politics And Cannibalism? Introducing The Dourties, Chelsea, Bill, Hillary, Barrack Obama, George Bush, Jr., And All Of Capital Hill! | jon_johnfrancisayres@yahoo.com | Microbiology Forum | 0 | 10-06-2007 05:59 AM |
| Ecol expressed Calmodulin doesn't work? | Isaac Li | Protein Forum | 0 | 04-12-2006 05:46 PM |
| Flaws in Current Atomic Theory? | cinquirer | Physics Forum | 42 | 11-25-2003 06:58 PM |