| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| With due respect to Dr. Parida, I am genuinely surprised by his advice about washing hands to clean ethidium bromide contamination. Ethidium bromide is dangerous and is a strong mutagent either in buffer or in the gel. Always handle ethidium bromide gels with gloves and dispose the gloves and gels in a ethidium bromide solid waste biohazardous container. Washing hands with water (though that is the first thing to do as soon as possible) will not remove ethidium bromide that is pretty strongly bonded with your skin. Any ethidium bromide spill on benchtops should be solidified using RED Z, or some such proven hazardous liquid disposal agent and should be disposed off as per institute guidelines. Surface repeatedly washed with butanol, and other recommended detergents till no fluorescence is observed under UV (again contact your safety regulation people). Ethidium bromide waste is considered to be that biohazardous, that it is disposed off separately from other biohazardous wastes, normally by incineration. All buffers (including running buffers) containing Ethidium bromide (any concentration even traces), should be filtered through activated charcoal filters (we do that in our lab which are also available commercially), ensured that the traces are well below safety limits and then disposed off down the sink. If you have ethidium bromide spill on your coat, carefully pack them in a biohazardous bag and contact your environment safety people on the best way to dispose it off. Washing them will only contaminate your washing machine, other clothes and yourselves. Different institutes follow slightly different guidelines on disposing ethidium bromide waste. Careless handling of ethidium bromide can contaminate others in the lab too which is not an ethical practice. Best of luck Jayakumar T. Nair, Ph.D., Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo, NY 14263 -----Original Message----- From: [Only registered users see links. ] [mailto:[Only registered users see links. ].indiana.edu] On Behalf Of Siddhartha Parida Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 11:40 PM To: [Only registered users see links. ] Subject: Re: Methods Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18 Etbr is its stock solution(10mg/ml) form is to some extent harmful but not when used in gels or staining buffer , u can just wash ur hands if u get in touch On 2/19/06, [Only registered users see links. ] <[Only registered users see links. ].indiana.edu> wrote: changed lab had to wash this it "el" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: a ofcourse)and changed it lab had to wash this am it and and -- Sidharth Parida Senior Faculty Center for biotechnology and Research Neelachal Inst of Medical Sciences O.C.H.C building , Near Ram Mandir Bhubaneswar-3 ORISSA 09437089337(M) [Only registered users see links. ] _______________________________________________ Methods mailing list [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ].net >, "Jayakumar, R" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: Well, if it's strongly bound to skin then it's harmless :-) That's what skin does - protects against external damage. "Problem" is, EthBr does *not* bind pretty strongly to skin and is washed away by water/soap very efficiently. It is not "biohazardous"! that it is disposed off separately In most of the USA, I believe, regulations are that, starting from some low concentration, EthBr waste can go to the sink. Same as for most radioactive materials. Makes common sense. ... And the building, and the city!, oh, the Earth! Different Careless handling of anything is bad practice in the lab. But hugely exaggregating the danger is not the best way of ethical standards in the lab. DK |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| so basically you are saying I have contaminated all my clothes, washing machine and probably my apartment? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <dtdtkm$jvp$[Only registered users see links. ].indiana.edu>, [Only registered users see links. ] (Don Gilbert) wrote: A sensible site. Few quotes (emphasis mine): " Ethidium bromide is commonly used in molecular biology laboratories. While it is *not* regulated as hazardous waste, the mutagenic properties of this substance may present a hazard. ... Aqueous solutions containing <10ug/ml ethidium bromide *can* be released to the drain. " DK |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I don't think you need to worry. You probably couldn't have had more than 10 micrograms of EtBr on your jeans. Then you made 2 serial dilutions of that in 40 or so liters of water (wash and rinse cycle), and I'd say you probably don't need to worry about having contaminated anything. Mike Sullivan On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:29 PM, el wrote: --- Michael L. Sullivan Plant Research Molecular Geneticist US Dairy Forage Research Center ARS-USDA 1925 Linden Drive West Madison, WI 53706 (608) 890-0046 (Phone) (608) 890-0076 (FAX) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| DK wrote: When I was a student, we had to do Cesium Chloride preps of some plasmid (do students still do that? I was terrified of the ultracentrifuge, probably connected with my fear of washing machines Of course the preps were HEAVILY laced with EB (not to mention CsCl!) and of course I did JUST what the prof suggested NOT to do, which was put my hand behind the tube while I punctured it with a large-bore needle to pull the band with my plasmid. Whoops! So I had basically injected (not deeply, fortunately) myself with EB/salt solution glowing-red. I did survive, evidently, although the case for brain damage could be made ;-) - Susan |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Susan Hogarth" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: Oh yes, we did that, too. In a lab course, but I never did it again. Although there are still some applications that need this kind of purification. But they became rare... The two advantages of EtBr are good water solubility and an instability to light... Thats quite normal :-)) Christian -- [X] <-- nail here for new monitor |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| el wrote: I wouldnt worry too much about it. There's no doubt that it is not good for you and that it is a strong mutagen. However, it doesnt penetrate cells easily, and it is easily washed away. Wash your stuff a few times and it'll be so diluted that it will be fine. Use the incident as a lesson though! Depending on your level of funding, you might consider SYBRSafe stain by Molecular Probes. It's much more expensive, and has a couple of other drawbacks, but it's less harmful than EtBr. Scott. |
| Tags |
| bromide , clothes , contamination , ethidium |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RE to Jim 3975 - Strong contamination with ethidium bromide | Prof. Piero Sestili | Protocols and Methods Forum | 17 | 06-14-2007 04:02 PM |
| Strong contamination with ethidium bromide | Undergrad | Protocols and Methods Forum | 6 | 06-14-2007 03:12 PM |
| RE to Jim 3975 - Strong contamination with ethidium bromide | Jayakumar, R | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 06-11-2007 04:42 PM |
| Strong contamination with ethidium bromide | Jayakumar, R | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 06-05-2007 04:33 PM |
| ethidium bromide contamination on clothes | DK | Protocols and Methods Forum | 5 | 06-19-2006 03:02 PM |