| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I've posted a gel photo at http://home.hawaii.rr.com/ovenfish/gel.jpg that I'd like some comments on. Lanes 1 and 5 contain a 100bp DNA ladder. Lanes 2 and 3 are linearized cloning vectors. Lanes 6-8 are genomic DNA extracted from purified coral cells using the Qiagen DNeasy kit. Note the ladder pattern in these lanes. Also note that the samples in lanes 2 and 3 were mixed with the same loading dye, so the loading dye is not contaminated with any DNA ladder. My interpretation is that we have inadvertantly repeated the classic experiment by Hewish and Burgoyne that demonstrated the regular periodicity of DNA packaging into nucleosomes. The bands have a spacing of approximately 200bp which is consistent with selective DNA digestion by nucleases at the more vulnerable regions between nucleosomes, yielding concatamers of one nucleosome, two nucleosomes, three nucleosomes, etc. on up the ladder. We have seen this phenomonon occasionally with other species as well, including in extracts of EDTA-preserved whole blood from a marine mammal and frozen muscle tissue from a marine snail. Some people in the lab have suggested that our instruments or reagents may be contaminated with nucleases, but extractions of other samples with the same instruments/reagents often yield high MW DNA, casting doubt on the contamination theory. Alternatively, endogenous nucleases within the cells of the tissue sample may be at fault. The DNeasy protocol begins with a lenghty incubation in the presence of proteinase K. Perhaps the digestion conditions lead to a liberation of the DNA from the nuclease and it is subsequently attacked by cytosolic nucleases before they themselves are inactivated by the proteinase? My questions are these: 1. Have others seen this ladder pattern in their gDNA extractions? 2. Does my "Hewish and Burgoyne redux" interpretation seem plausible? 3. Could endogenous enzymatic activity be at fault? 4. Can anyone offer suggestions on how to prevent the DNA degradation? For the coral work the cells were laboriously collected and purified by density-gradient centrifugation and flow cytometry in order to eliminate intracellular algal symbionts present in the species. We had hoped for high MW gDNA to use as starting material for microsatellite library construction, so the results were a little disappointing. Thanks in advance for your comments! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Could it be apoptosis? One of the hallmarks of apotosis is formation of this sort of DNA ladder. It sounds like the cells go through a lot prior to the DNA extraction. Is it possible that all the handling has induced programed cell death? Are the coral cells viable if you purify them but don't extract them for DNA? Just a thought. Mike On Nov 29, 2005, at 2:50 PM, [Only registered users see links. ] wrote: --- Michael L. Sullivan Plant Research Molecular Geneticist US Dairy Forage Research Center ARS-USDA 1925 Linden Drive West Madison, WI 53706 (608) 890-0046 (Phone) (608) 890-0076 (FAX) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
| Tags |
| extractions , gdna , ladder , pattern |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does any of this make sense ??? | Yrael | Physics Forum | 3 | 09-12-2005 03:11 AM |
| The Beauty of Math | Anthony | Physics Forum | 40 | 03-01-2005 09:08 PM |