| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am concerned that a phage prep I've done contains more than one phage. This should be unlikely and I'm wondering whether the symptoms are due to a different state of the phage DNA, but would this affect the mobility of the phage through CsCl? Anyway, here's the situation: -Phage suspension (harvested from overlays) precipitated with PEG, resuspended in SM buffer. -0.75g/ml CsCl added and spun 160000g x24hr (Beckman SW50.1 rotor) to purify through equilibrium gradient. -3 bands seen - one right at the top of the tube (assuming debris), one a couple of mm below that (assuming phage) - designated "U", and a third around 5mm below that - designated "L". -Obtained bands U & L, did a quick DNA prep to visualise on agarose gel (1ul sample + 9ul dH2O + 4ul 2.5X SDS-EDTA sample buffer; heat 65Cx5min & run on agarose). I also ran 1ul samples in normal gel loading buffer (i.e. I would expect to see no band as any phage should not have been popped open to release their DNA) -no DNA seen in the unpopped samples (as expected) -3 bands seen in each of the popped samples. Bands the same apparent size for both U & L but the intensity varied (in the U sample the larger size band was more intense, in the L sample the lower). Are these bands indicative of different forms of phage DNA? The phage are dsDNA myoviridae but I don't have any information regarding whether the chromosome is linear. -phage assays on both L & U indicate that phage is present So, what's the reason for the 2 bands in the CsCl gradient? Could there be differences in the physical structure of the phage chromosomal DNA? Could one band be phage that have lost their tail fibres? TIA Chris |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Historians believe that in newspost <cslfm8$j8n$[Only registered users see links. ].cam.ac.uk> on Wed, 19 Jan 2005, C Coward <[Only registered users see links. ].cam.ac.uk> penned the following literary masterpiece: I've seen lambda preps (100's of mgs DNA scale) where one gets two bands but vastly different intensities. I've always thought one band is failed/ empty or mispackaged phages. Long time since I've done this though. As to whether the DNA's are identical. Not too difficult to quickly test. Do an RE digest on them with a variety of RE's and see what you get on an agarose gel. Duncan -- I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing noise they make as they go flying by. Duncan Clark GeneSys Ltd. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| C Coward wrote: Why don't you look at the sample in the electron microscope or place them onto bacteria, to see which ones are active? Call me old-fashioned, but one should not forget basic biology over all that nucleic acid fiddeling. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Dr Engelbert Buxbaum <[Only registered users see links. ]> writes: Nor am I - I've done a phage assay on both of the bands, and both appear to contain phage. Once I manage to purify some phage DNA (see a new post below) I'll try & RE map them to determine whether they are the same. In the meantime, I'm still wondering whether it's possible for there to be something structurally different in a single phage that would account for a difference in density on a CsCl gradient. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| C Coward wrote: Hi, one reason could be that there are DI particles (defective interfering particles). Make a plaque assay, you should see different size of plaques. best wishes peter |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| C Coward wrote: Ok, thats half your rent. Now I would try and repurify the phages from both samples, to see whether you get homogeneous bands or whether there will be two bands again in each of the samples. |
| Tags |
| band , cscl , double , gradient , phage , prep |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about CsCl gradient purify chloroplast DNA!!!! | Mr.Q | Protocols and Methods Forum | 2 | 10-22-2003 02:25 AM |