| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am having a lot of trouble with in vitro transcription and wonder if anyone can help. The reaction is to produce Dig-labelled riboprobes. I am using all Roche reagents except for RNAguard. I follow the protocol given with the SP6 and T7 transcriptases (Roche). My first problem seems to be with the DNaseI which despite increasing incubation time still seems not to be removing all the template DNA. Following this, the clean up kits I have been using seem to be very ineffective. I initially used Qiagen RNeasy kit cleanup protocol but this has a cut off of 200 bases and some of my transcripts are borderline for this. I couldn't get much, if any, product after the kit so I then got the Qiagen RNA/DNA kit which processes transcripts down to about 25 bases. This kit, however, has many more steps including a reprecipitation which seems to be giving an infinitely low yield. My most recent reaction was for 4 transcripts (2 genes, sense and antisense) and I got a different result for each. One appeared not to have transcribed, the next did but had no product after cleanup (RNA/DNA kit). A third had 4 bands on the gel following cleanup and the last potentially produced a usable probe which I am currently testing. I carried out the same procedure on each, at the same time. I know I included all the correct reagents etc and am also careful a out RNase contamination. I am qutie new to molecular biology (marine biologist by trade) Is this just a norotiously difficult reaction or am I missing something obvious? Any suggestions?! Pamela |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| > I'm not sure what your downstream application is, but I don't think you need to do such an extensive cleanup. Certainly not for hybridizing a blot. In the past, I've simply used a gel filtration spin column (like the kind used for cleaning up sequencing reactions, e.g. AutoSeq G-50 from Pharmacia) to clean up in vitro transcription reactions. I never noticed problems with yield loss with these. Mike -- Michael L. Sullivan, Ph.D Research Plant Molecular Geneticist U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center 1925 Linden Drive West Madison WI, 53706 (608) 264-5397 Phone (608) 264-5147 Fax --- |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <[Only registered users see links. ]>, AudioHELP <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote: Were any of the four bands the expected size for the full length transcript? Many templates are prone to producing prematurely terminated products, does this account for the additional bands? I also agree with the other poster that a simple size exclusion spin column is a reasonable approach. I'm not familiar with the kits that you mention, but Dig-labelled probes don't behave exactly the same way as unmodified RNAs. However, I'm puzzled by the failure of the DNaseI treatment, as this enzyme step is usually pretty effective. Good luck, Pam |
| Tags |
| problems , transcription , vitro |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DNAse in DNA Isolation Interfering with In Vitro Transcription Reaction | deebee12 | DNA Extraction Forum | 1 | 06-23-2008 12:54 AM |
| Non-isotopic method for In vitro transcription | cv2135@columbia.edu | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 06-16-2008 02:15 PM |
| Transcription problems? | sunshyne61987@yahoo.com | Zebrafish Forum | 0 | 07-05-2007 07:01 PM |
| T7 in vitro transcription | Vayuputra | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 07-19-2003 06:01 PM |