Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Protocols and Methods Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique.


western blot of GFP fusion protein

western blot of GFP fusion protein - Protocols and Methods Forum

western blot of GFP fusion protein - Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2003, 04:14 PM
EK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein



High MW proteins are much slower to transfer. Most probably, in your case
you are not transferring any at all. Try longer transfer times. Some people
posted here before that supplementing the transfer buffer (Tris-Gly-20%MeOH)
with 0.05-0.1% SDS helps, too. Also, check if you are properly inhibiting
proteases in your lysates. Adding peptide inhibitors, EDTA and PMSF would
help.
-Emir

"tiger" <[Only registered users see links. ].hk> wrote in message
news:bn8phr$nq2$[Only registered users see links. ].cuhk.edu.hk...
blot
give
is
protein.
ECL
detect
extract


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2003, 05:45 AM
tiger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

hi, anyone: I want to ask some questions of GFP fusion protein western blot
?
I have constructed a vector of GFP fusion protein and transfected into
HEK293 cells using lipofectin. I check the protein expression under
Fluorescence microscope 48hr after transfection, it is about 60% cells give
green fluorescence in the GFP control cells and 35% cells in my GFP fusion
protein tansfected cells(localized in nucleus, it is nuclear protein). It is
overexpressed. when I did western blot, I can detect the band of GFP in
control (it is not strong). But I can't find the band of my fusion protein.
I lyzed the cell with RIPA buffer, loaded 10ug of whole cell lysis,
transfered to PVDF membrane. first antibody ( anti-GFP ployclonely
antibody1:1000, santa cruz) and secondary antibody (1:10,000 amersham), ECL
(amersham). the molecular weight of protein is about 120kd(with the GFP
tag).
I think the proportion of my protein may be too low in cell lysis to detect
it, maybe I should load more cell lysis. Or I should do the nuclear extract
of transfected cells. Or I should change antibody.
All suggestions are appreciated. thanks in advance!

mike




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2003, 09:20 AM
Rene
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

I'm having similar problems with plant material, I assume with control
you have free GFP?! Anyway, fusion protein generally lot less, and
additionally some mutants break down more easily, resulting in more
bands.
Have you tried antibody for the protein itself?

Rene.


"EK" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<r7Tlb.27$[Only registered users see links. ]>...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2003, 10:39 AM
James Giddings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein


ponceau stain your blot to check that the right size protein transfered,
if it did, use some different antibodies, if not, try using an ethanol
based transfer buffer.

On 24 Oct 2003, Rene wrote


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2003, 03:44 PM
Peter Ashby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

In article <bnbgir$2d93$[Only registered users see links. ].cuhk.edu.hk>,
"tiger" <[Only registered users see links. ].hk> wrote:


Non specific bands seem to be what Santa Cruz do best. Try somewhere
else.

Peter

--
Peter Ashby
School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Scotland
To assume that I speak for the University of Dundee is to be deluded.
Reverse the Spam and remove to email me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2003, 06:30 AM
tiger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

1. I can see the fluoresecence of my fusion protein, it is
expressed. -------- the fusion protein expression is ok
2. I can detected the expression of GFP protein (vector only) in the western
blot--------- the detection system should be ok

so I think the problem should be in the sample preparation or protein
transfer.

As my fusion protein is nuclear protein, I don't know whether the RIPA(1x
PBS,1% Nonidet P-40 ,0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1mM PMSF and
Protein inhibitor mixture) can completely lyse the cell (especially the
nuclear protein). At same time even it is lysed, the proportion of my
protein in the whole cell lysis may be low. Maybe I should try the nuclear
extract method.

As the GFP is about 27kd, it is easy to transfer. I don't know whether my
protein(120kd) can be properly transferred. Now I used the three-buffer
system with constant current 60mA for 1.5 hr(Anode buffer I Tris0.3M PH
10.4, Methanol 10%; Anode buffer II Tris 25mM PH 10.4,Methanol 10%; Cathode
buffer Tris 25mM PH 9.4, Glycine 40mM, Methanol 10%). there is still some
bands in gel after transfer. I don't know whether the transfer is ok or not,
maybe I should try longer transfer time.

I didn't have the antibody of my protein. The anti-GFP antibody is
multiclonal antibody (Santa Cruz), it should be ok (I can detect the GFP
protein, even there are some nonspecific bands). Maybe I will also try
antibody of other companies last.

Thanks for all your kindly helps!

"EK" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:r7Tlb.27$[Only registered users see links. ]...
people
(Tris-Gly-20%MeOH)
fusion
It


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2003, 09:58 AM
Wolfgang Schechinger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

Tiger,

just some thoughts:

Sometimes it happens that an antibody does not recognize a modified protein
anymore. Do you have some data on where the antiGFP binds? You might add
some other epitope like vsv angainst which you may obtain monoclonals.

make sure your transfer is complete. Try a longer transfer time (e.g
double, but don't increase voltage or current). Stack two membranes if
you're afraid of loosing your protein. Put another membrane on the *other*
side of the gel if you're paranoid. GFP has a strange structure (barrel)
and nuclear proteins might have strange charge distribution (some nuclear
localization signals a highly posively charged stretch of Arg and Lys).

Try another transfer method (use eg liquid transport without electricity
and use one membrane on each side of the gel)

To get an idea about sensitivity of your antibody, you might probe a dot
blot with various dilutions of your protein (or cell extract). Sometimes
this works: Hold a vial with your extract into the blue beam (490 nm) of a
photometer, mercury or xenon lamp or a 488nm laser if available (confocal
microscope, FACS, ...) to guess some green fluorescence. If you have access
to a fluorescence imager, test your gel and membranes for green bands.

HTH, Wo

---
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2003, 10:44 AM
Rene
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

BTW, your fusion protein isn't membrane bound, I assume?!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2003, 12:13 PM
Sean Patterson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default western blot of GFP fusion protein

>In article <bnbgir$2d93$[Only registered users see links. ].cuhk.edu.hk>,

I concur.

--
Sean Patterson, Ph.D.
CONICET Associate Scientist
Associate Professor
Department of Morphophysiology
School of Medical Sciences
Cuyo National University
Mendoza, Argentina
Tel: (0261) 449-4001 ext.2684/2747
Fax: (0261) 449-4117
e-mail: [Only registered users see links. ]
---
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blot , fusion , gfp , protein , western


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 08-01-2010 02:18 PM
Human Cytome Project - an idea - Update 19 April 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 06-01-2009 02:17 PM
Human Cytome Project - Update 6 Jan. 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 0 01-06-2005 11:18 AM
New Saccharomyces Sequences 11/27/04 Mike Cherry Yeast Forum 0 11-29-2004 12:39 AM
New Saccharomyces Sequences 05/19/04 SGD Sequences Yeast Forum 0 05-23-2004 04:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.22040 seconds with 16 queries