| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| We have a problem that is driving us up the wall. Developing Westerns with chemiluminescence (including Amersham, Pierce and NEN products) we are frequently getting no signal at all. This happens regardless of the origin of the sample, transfer conditions, nitrocellulose or PVDF, primary or secondary antibody (or using biotin-avidin amplification), or changing the exposure conditions. We've changed the water, remade all the solutions, tried different blocking solutions, an even not used block at all. Some, but not all, of the primaries have azide, but the secondaries don't. The same antibody, on the same samples will give a whopping signal one day (film exposure less than 10 seconds for optimal signal), and the next time an overnight exposure won't even give background on the membrane. We always have a phosphorescent dot on the sandwich, so we know it's not a film developing problem. Now I've talked to a couple of colleagues in other universities who say that they have been experiencing the same sort of thing. Is anyone else out there seeing something similar? Anybody identified a problem, or have ideas? Any help appreciated. Agonizing in Argentina --- |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Sean Patterson" <[Only registered users see links. ].edu.ar> wrote in message news:a05010404bb6fd6dfd070@[10.0.10.84]... I almost sure it is not, but could that be that your signal is too strong and you are depoeting the reagents by the time you expose the film? That would be obvious by the appearance of staining on the film in the place where you rexpected band would be. I am asking this, because you wrote that in successful experiments you would have whopping signal, whereas usually a successful experiment is when you get a signal for ~30-60-sec exposure over normal sensitivity film (like Kodak X-OMAT AR). Also, always follow the same guidelines for protein loading. Your band of interest should contain somewhere between 20-200 ng of protein.The only time I have problems with Westerns is when I am lazy to do protein content estimations (assuming antibodies are good and working OK). Emir |
| Tags |
| chemiluminescence , problems |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with chemiluminescence | Jayakumar, R | Protocols and Methods Forum | 6 | 08-27-2003 10:40 PM |
| Bionet posting (problems w/ chemiluminescence) | Sean Patterson | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 08-27-2003 10:03 PM |
| Bionet posting (problems w/ chemiluminescence) | Sean Patterson | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 08-27-2003 02:55 PM |
| Problems with chemiluminescence | EK | Protocols and Methods Forum | 1 | 08-26-2003 06:32 PM |