| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Science Groups New! | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protocols and Methods Forum Post Any Protocol, Method, Technique, Procedure or Tips / Troubleshooting for any Molecular Biology Technique. |
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| Hello to everybody! I am doing transactivation experiments to analyse a promoter for the first time, and I have some questions. 1) In the beginning I have tried three promoter+reporter/transactivator ratio: 1:1; 1:2; and 1:3. Of course all was done in triplicate including a negative control. Everything worked fine as I had increasing fold over control values: 10 in 1:1, 15 in 1:2 and 26 in 1:3. Now my question is: if I want to publish these data, which of the three experiments shoud I use? Of course I would like to use the 1:3 ones which give a higher transactivation values but I have been told that this means "cheating" and that the only set I can use is the 1:1. On the other hand other people agree with the 1:3. This subject is new for me, so I would like to have a more general and international opinion. Than you very much, you help is VERY precious to me! ![]() |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
![]() |
| Tags |
| promoter , ratio |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| promoter binding site searching-why both strands? | gocha_ada | Bioinformatics | 3 | 03-26-2008 02:15 PM |
| Generating Transgenic Mice | enemiimene | Knockout Mouse Forum | 2 | 02-05-2008 02:59 PM |
| Promoter control | KPMR | DNA Techniques | 2 | 12-13-2007 01:37 PM |
| Finding Promoter Region in a Sequence | gandalfthegrey | Bioinformatics | 1 | 11-15-2007 11:14 AM |
| promoter region | aftabac | Bioinformatics | 2 | 08-13-2006 05:56 AM |