Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Protein Science
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Protein Science Post Questions and Discuss Protein Structure and Function, Protein Localization etc.. Please do not post Proteomic questions here, there is a Proteomic Forum below.


in vivo validation of abolished protein-protein interaction

in vivo validation of abolished protein-protein interaction - Protein Science

in vivo validation of abolished protein-protein interaction - Post Questions and Discuss Protein Structure and Function, Protein Localization etc.. Please do not post Proteomic questions here, there is a Proteomic Forum below.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:26 PM
Pipette Filler
Points: 612, Level: 12 Points: 612, Level: 12 Points: 612, Level: 12
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default in vivo validation of abolished protein-protein interaction



Hi there,

I have a more fundamental question about validation of the biological significance of protein-protein interactions. My colleague recently found an interesting protein-protein interaction confirmed by diverse pull down assays and he speculated that interaction between these proteins, letís call them A and B confers an interesting phenotype in vivo (the phenotype is triggered by overexpression of protein A). By analysing the aa of protein A at the N-terminus that interact with protein B he generated a N-terminally truncated protein A that cannot bind to protein B as confirmed by GST pulldown. He then made transgenic mice overexpressing the truncated protein A and surprisingly the mice lost the phenotype. For him this result was proof that the binding interaction between protein A and B is responsible for the phenotype.

In the meantime I generated transgenic mice expressing protein A with a single point mutation within the binding region that abolishes interaction with protein B as well. The block of interaction between protein A and B was confirmed by co-IP using tissue from my transgenic mice so there is no doubt the interaction is abolished in vivo. Unexpectedly, my transgenics retained the phenotype and seem to disprove his theory. Obviously there is now a controversy about how both results should be interpreted and possibly reconciled. Although I am not really an expert in protein biology in my opinion the interaction between protein A and B is insignificant for the phenotype. It is plausible that my colleague changed the conformation of protein A by the applied truncation in a way that substantially altered its function. I would appreciate any other thoughts on this awkward topic.

Thank you very much in advance.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
abolished , interaction , proteinprotein , validation , vivo


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 08-01-2010 02:18 PM
Human Cytome Project - an idea - Update 19 April 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 06-01-2009 02:17 PM
Human Cytome Project - Update 6 Jan. 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 0 01-06-2005 11:18 AM
New Saccharomyces Sequences 11/27/04 Mike Cherry Yeast Forum 0 11-29-2004 12:39 AM
New Saccharomyces Sequences 05/19/04 SGD Sequences Yeast Forum 0 05-23-2004 04:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.16607 seconds with 16 queries