| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Protein Forum Protein Forum |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dear Andreas Savelsbergh, I was founding in an old forum, that you routinely use Coomassie stained gels directly for electroblotting and subsequent antibody detection. I also used Coomassie stained gels but until now only for immunoblotting on PVDF-membranes. The Coomassie stain disappeared after soaking the PVDF-membranes in 100% methanol prior blocking and antibody steps. However, now I'm using nitrocellulose membranes where the methanol-step is omitted. Without a methanol-step it seems that the Coomassie stain will persist on the membrane also during the first blocking step and all the following incubation steps. Does the Coomassie stain interfere with the antibody binding or the chemoluminesent detection (I'm using ECL detection system)? And if yes, is there a possibility to remove the Coomassie stain from the NC-membrane before immunoblotting? Or is it only possible to use Coomassie stained gels directly for immunoblotting only together with PVDF-membranes? I would be very grateful for some helpful informations. Sincerely yours Catrin Kaydamov |
| Tags |
| blot , coomassie , gel , sdspage , stained , western |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Western Blot Background Troubleshooting | molecule2005 | Western Blot Forum | 18 | 10-07-2010 11:49 AM |
| Can we use dot blot inplace of Western blot? | peterish | Western Blot Forum | 3 | 06-16-2010 07:59 PM |
| Western blot | admin | Article Discussion | 2 | 04-23-2010 07:31 PM |
| dot blot and western blot | Liang | Western Blot Forum | 1 | 08-07-2009 03:26 PM |
| western blot question | Jayakumar, R | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 09-27-2007 06:49 PM |