| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Lubricants in bearings and gear units ensure that not too much energy is lost through friction. Yet it still takes a certain percentage of the energy to compensate for friction losses. Lubricants made of liquid crystals could reduce friction to almost zero. [Only registered users see links. ] (Published at Sciencedaily) With these Lubricants we may see more efficient cars and bykes. And also it will boost all Machines used in Production. Saving lots of energy. And Transportation costs will go down. I think it will take atleast 4-5 years to commercialise. Bye Sanny Be Intelligent: [Only registered users see links. ] |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| > Lubricants in bearings and gear units ensure that not too much energy Most bearings, gears, pistons/cylinders and other wear surfaces are designed so that fricition with conventional lubricants is < 5% output so there isn't much room for improvement as far as directly saving energy in conventional machinery is concerned. If wind resistance is a factor then the advantage would be even less. The only way to get real energy savings from a super lubricant is that it could result in so much less wear than conventional lubricants that previously impractical designs, i. e., lighter gears made of softer materials, could suddenly become attractive. Bret Cahill |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In sci.physics Sanny <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: When teflon was invented it was supposed to give us near frictionless bearings. Then it was discovered that it would flow under a load. Glaringly lacking in all the breathless announcements of liquid crystal lubes is any mention of load and temperature range. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| another factor is cost. if it's too expensive to manufacture, it would be more worthwhile to go with the older but cheaper lubricants. Evil overlord of <a href=http://www.gamestotal.com> [Only registered users see links. ] </a> <a href=http://uc.gamestotal.com> [Only registered users see links. ] </a> <a href=http://gc.gamestotal.com> [Only registered users see links. ] </a> <a href=http://3700ad.gamestotal.com> [Only registered users see links. ] </a> <a href=http://manga.gamestotal.com> [Only registered users see links. ] </a> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In sci.physics Sanny <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: No, you won't. The article you referenced is a rip from a Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft press release with zero useful details. Investigations into the lubricating properties of liquid crystal materials goes back to at least 1994. Canadian patent: LIQUID CRYSTAL POLYMER TECHNOLOGY CHEMICALS AND APPLICATIONS Canadian Intellectual Property Office #2456536 Journel: Kimura, Y., Nakano, K., Kato, T., Control of friction coefficient by applying electric fields across liquid crystal boundary films, Wear, 1994, 175: 143. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Nov 11, 11:00*am, Bret Cahill <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: Well, but that's why the super lubricants are mostly used by people with A.I, RISC Computers, optic fibers, optical computers, Holograms, USB, lasers, masers, super printers, HDTV, CD, DVD, Refrigerators, A/C, Satellites, autonomous vehicles, Pv Cells, On-Line- Publishing, and non-idiotc robots, rather than wanks from Detroit. |
| Tags |
| crystal , frictionless , gears , liquid , lubricants |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nanotube Mix Makes Liquid Crystal | Bubba Do Wah Ditty | Physics Forum | 0 | 03-03-2004 04:18 PM |