| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| AllYou! wrote: I suggest that you cross a busy street without using time. /BAH |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In news:[Only registered users see links. ], jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@aol> mused: We all do that. We compare our motion to the motion of the vehicles in the street, and make our decisions accordingly. The fact that we call that comparison of motions 'time' proves that it's just an intellectual concept. That's how we came to invent time. We took what we believed to be a regular, predictable motion, and compared all other motions to it, and we pronounced it 'time'. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 8, 5:42*am, "AllYou!" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: The metric expansion of space can not exceed C, but even if the expansion is at C we could not have calculated the beginning of time or the big bang correctly because some light would never reach us to judge red shift correctly for proper dating of the universe if space time is expanding at c in all directions its like running on a tred mill going in the oppisite direction if its moving at C and your moving at C you never reach your target |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| [Only registered users see links. ] wrote: Nonsense. It isn't that far off from the dot on the oscilloscope screen that can be made to "move faster than c." Of course the dot isn't moving at all, the beam is repointed elsewhere. Similarly "space" can be filled in in a way that makes things appear to move apart at rates greater than c while they're actually moving at rates lower than c. So is the imposition of new space between galaxies the same as relative motion? Given that attraction between bodies, and clusters of bodies, decreases as the square of the distance, imposing new space between two galaxies has such effects. Don't hurt your brain thinking about such things. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| AllYou! wrote: He very clearly used the word "believe." He doesn't know. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Sanforized wrote: c is the limit at which we in this 3d area can record. holog |
| Tags |
| back , time |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! | drelliot@gmail.com | Physics Forum | 1 | 07-06-2006 05:19 PM |
| Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment | Ranger West | Physics Forum | 17 | 04-11-2004 12:19 PM |
| The Theory of Moving Dimensions: Space and Time Are Moving Relative to One-Another | Ranger West | Physics Forum | 8 | 01-14-2004 05:17 PM |