Can't look back in time

In news:a543c$48f90c55$cdd08568$[Only registered users see links. ],
Sanforized <[Only registered users see links. ]> mused:

BURT claims that we see all of the Universe, and makkes this claim
with no substantiation at all, and is certainly not what is known.

On Oct 17, 5:03*pm, "AllYou!" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

There is no difference.

In
news:[Only registered users see links. ],
BURT <[Only registered users see links. ]> mused:

Sure there is. One has some hard evidence to back it up, and the
other is pure speculation.

On Oct 18, 11:59*am, "AllYou!" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Burt/Mitch/Whatever will keep this up as long a anyone keeps answering
him.

In
news:[Only registered users see links. ],
BURT <[Only registered users see links. ]> mused:

Than what, and for what?

On Oct 19, 9:10*am, "AllYou!" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Intuition is an extension of the scientific method.

In
news:[Only registered users see links. ],
BURT <[Only registered users see links. ]> mused:

It might or might be this, that, or anything else, except that it's
not a *part* of the scientific method. Intuition, while it might
cause someone to pursue an idea using the scientific method, does
not fall anywhere *within* the scientific method, and is therefore
no basis to make the scientific assertion that we can observe all of
the known universe.

On Oct 19, 6:19*pm, "AllYou!" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

5 Discuss things with BURT
GO TO 5