Material - Spiritual interface

The material universe that we are able to perceive and examine
objectively extends from the visible horizon down to infinitesimal. We
really don't have anything more than an "educated guess" as to what
lies beyond either of these limits.

The infinitesimal boundary is at or near the Planck Length. What lies
below this Planck Length cut-off? We are not able to probe or explore
this realm objectively. Do we just accept it "on faith and faith
alone?" Has anyone ever empirically proven that quarks exist?

If Superstring Theory or Membrane Theory has things presented to us at
any where near the correct assessments there must be a lot that we
simply can not evaluate or test, scientifically.

Are the other dimensions and the universes they seem to represent
congruent with the Biblical information pertaining to the levels of
Heaven?

Gordon

On 2 sep, 17:13, Antares 531 <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

A Natural worldview requires that we see the spiritual for what it
time and again proves to be: The working of the human brain.

Biblical information on the other hand supposes that daylight existed
before the son, and that our ancestors must have committed incest,
most probably (as no daughters of Adam and Eve are mentioned ) with
their mother.

Apperantly you posses little spirituality :-(
But please surprise me to the contrary

Love,

Peter van Velzen
September 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands

"Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE@swbell.net> wrote in message
newsalqb4dvpnr19b52be5dla8ekhs97u4558@4ax.com...

'Visible horizon'!! LOL!!


Ah I see: it's just the old, old *3-step trick*:
i) Pretend you've found a part of nature that science doesn't know much
about...
ii) Quick! Put Yahweh in it!...
iii) Talk as if this somehow validates Bronze-age fairy tales...

G.

Correcting a stupid spelling error

On 2 sep, 18:38, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]>
wrote:

On Sep 2, 11:32�am, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]>
wrote:

Your reasoning pre-supposes that earth was the first planet created,
and the sun was the first source of light.
Robert B. Winn

On Sep 2, 4:38�pm, "Smiler" <[Only registered users see links. ].com> wrote:
I have read Genesis.
Robert B. Winn

Antares 531:


Does anyone care a shit?

--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...

My personal judgment of monotheism:
[Only registered users see links. ]