| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Suppose you were pounding a steel beam into the ground with a pile driver. After you had driven the beam say five feet into the ground, you then arranged to hit the top of the beam with a weight far heavier than normal, heavy enough to cause the beam to fail. Would the beam fail by bending or by snapping? Would the answer depend on how much force was applied? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dear Doug Wedel: On Jul 30, 2:27*pm, "Doug Wedel" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: The answer is "bending or crushing, depending on length". No, it usually has more to do with the unrestrained length (above ground) and the speed of the impact hammer. Most steel is relatively low carbon and low sulfur (what got the Titanic rivets and surrounding metal had brittle failure when the iceberg hit), so it usually able to deform gracefully. [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] If the driver moves too fast (say approaching the speed of sound), you have essentially an explosive failure, as localized energy is too high for the beam to stay in one piece. Think kinetic or explosive welding... David A. Smith |
| Tags |
| beams , fail , question , steel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| question about phenol/water saturated solution | Z.L. K | Protocols and Methods Forum | 2 | 02-11-2008 12:05 AM |
| WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | Physics Forum | 240 | 08-10-2007 06:25 AM |
| Just a big question... | rahemanvelji@yahoo.ca | Physics Forum | 8 | 05-09-2005 08:44 PM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 1 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:06 AM |