| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If we are moving toward CMBR it will be blueshifted slightly. It will be redshifted as we are moving away from its direction of motion. The Doppler Shift to CMBR will give us our motion in space. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... [Only registered users see links. ] Velocity relative to CMB anisotropy From the CMB data it is seen that our local group of galaxies (the galactic cluster that includes the Solar System's Milky Way Galaxy) appears to be moving at 627 ± 22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB in the direction of galactic longitude l = 264.4o, b = 48.4o. [31] This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction). The standard interpretation of this temperature variation is a simple velocity redshift and blueshift due to motion relative to the the CMB, however alternative cosmological models can explain some fraction of the observed dipole temperature distribution in the CMB (see reference for one example). [32] |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Mitch; Scientists tell us that CMBR is throughout the universe in every direction. How could we be moving toward it or away from it? Please refer to my essay # 3 at [Only registered users see links. ] for more of my comments on CMBR. Regards, Ed Doscher On Apr 4, 10:27*pm, [Only registered users see links. ] wrote: |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Uncle Al wrote: There may not be a privileged centre, but there is a 'uniform' background against which motion can be referenced. You've not heard of proper motion of galaxies? Nor the suggested Great Attractor (evidence for which is suggested by the dipole anisotropy of the CMBR)? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| -- This message is brought to you by Androcles [Only registered users see links. ] "Steve Dorman" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... | There may not be a privileged centre, but there is a 'uniform' | background against which motion can be referenced. | | You've not heard of proper motion of galaxies? | Nor the suggested Great Attractor (evidence for which is suggested by | the dipole anisotropy of the CMBR)? [Only registered users see links. ] Dork Al Schwartz has not heard of it, correct. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Uncle Al wrote: reminds me a bit to conversations 6000y B.C. ;-) Kind regards, Daniel Mandic |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message news:JGyKj.16641$5o5.16061@newsfe15.ams2... hanson wrote: That beautiful false color pix sports the following quaint "explanation"... ahahahaha... ::: CMBR Dipole: Speeding Through the Universe ::: Credit: DMR, COBE, NASA, Four-Year Sky Map ::: Explanation: Our Earth is not at rest. The Earth moves around the Sun. ::: The Sun orbits the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way ::: Galaxy orbits in the Local Group of Galaxies. The Local Group falls ::: toward the Virgo Cluster of Galaxies. But these speeds are less than ::: the speed that all of these objects together move relative to the cosmic ::: microwave background radiation (CMBR). In the above all-sky map ::: from the COBE satellite, radiation in the Earth's direction of motion ::: appears blueshifted and hence hotter, while radiation on the opposite ::: side of the sky is redshifted and colder. The map indicates that the ::: Local Group moves at about 600 kilometers per second relative to ::: this primordial radiation. This high speed was initially unexpected ::: and its magnitude is still unexplained. Why are we moving so fast? ::: What is out there? hanson wrote: What does that say about MMX? -- Are they going to resurrect a Doppler aether now? ... What is the big deal about that pix if such dipoles are experienced or present at every mass laden point in cosmic space? ... What are the conditions to produce a pix that shows no dipoles? -- What would such a situation indicate to be? and AFA "What is out there?"... What is at the locations of these dipoles?... Are they just one of those "appearances" that have no real physical existence... like the end of the rainbow... a scenario only beloved by EDs?... ahahaha... ahahahanson |
| Tags |
| calculating , motion , space |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FFiMP: Misconceptions about Special Relativity | Jan Gooral | Physics Forum | 0 | 05-22-2008 02:53 PM |
| What is Gravity? | sdr@sdrodrian.com | Physics Forum | 1 | 01-27-2008 01:53 PM |
| The Achilles Heel of String Theory. | S D Rodrian | Physics Forum | 7 | 07-08-2006 02:40 PM |
| EXPLAINING TIME DILATION | TomGee | Physics Forum | 24 | 11-18-2004 12:52 AM |
| 21st Century Dynamics | Donald G. Shead | Physics Forum | 5 | 08-14-2003 11:43 PM |