HAWKING & THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

HAWKING & THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

Stepen Hawking mentions the Anthropic Principle
14 times in his book _ A Brief History of Time_.
Since the book has sold 10 million copies in 45
languages we must conclude the Anthropic Principle is
well known to Science.
Hawking defines the Anthropic Principle
on p 128-129:

"We see the universe the
way it is because we exist"

and says:

"Few people would quarrel with the validity
or utility of the weak Anthropic Principle."


On p. 128 Hawking says:

"One example of the use of the anthropic principle is to
"explain" why the Big Bang occurred about 10 billion years
ago-- it takes about that long for intelligent beings to
evolve."
(he then calculates the time to produce stars,
the elements, the solar system, and evolution
of Man which totals to roughly 10 billion years)

Half a dozen other major examples are well known and are
cited in his book.

WHAT IS INTERESTING TO ME is that Stephen Hawing
is able to use the Anthropic Principle to determine the
date of the Big Bang, but apparently FAILS TO REALIZE
that the Anthropic Principle also "explains" the date
of Biblical Creation.

Unbeknownst to Stephen Hawking Religion long ago
discovered the Anthropic Principle and identified it as the
explanation of God (Berkeley 1710). "God" according to
religion is in fact MIND. Hence when the mind of man came
into existence, "reality" (sometimes called the world or the
universe) also came into existence. Since we know that Homo
sapiens are about 100,000 year old, the Anthropic Principle
tells us that "reality" must be about 100,000 years old.
Religion calculated this long ago and arrived at the famous
figure of "6,000" years (Usher 1650) for the age of the
universe. This was before modern science discovered Man is
100,000 years old not 6,000 which explains why they are a
few years off. They are NOT 14 billion years off however!
Religion simply points out that past history (including the
Big Bang) is part of "human reality" hence the Anthropic
Principle clearly explains why the Big Bang actually
happened AFTER Biblical Creation even though Creation is
only 100,000 years old!
Fact is, the Anthropic Principle "explains" both God AND
Creation.
If Stepehn Hawking is so smart, why hasn't he realized
that the Anthropic Principle explains the "Biblical"
Creation as well as the "Big Bang" creation...? and why
doesn't he realize that the Anthropic Principle is nothing
other than the "Anthropomorphic God" of the Bible?
Are scientists slow or what?
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[Only registered users see links. ]
mirror site:
[Only registered users see links. ]
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
[Only registered users see links. ]
========================================

On Nov 8, 8:01 am, George Hammond <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

HAMMOND & THE MISANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

"Why is everyone so deluded that they don't see what I see?"

David A. Smith

On Nov 8, 8:01 am, George Hammond <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

HAMMOND & THE MISANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

"Why is everyone so deluded that they don't see what I see?"

David A. Smith

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:41:41 -0800, dlzc <[Only registered users see links. ]>
wrote:


Shove it up your ass, Smith.

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:41:41 -0800, dlzc <[Only registered users see links. ]>
wrote:


Shove it up your ass, Smith.

"George Hammond" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...

Um, no.

but apparently FAILS TO REALIZE

Um, no.

"George Hammond" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...

Um, no.

but apparently FAILS TO REALIZE

Um, no.

On Nov 8, 9:15 am, Voltaire <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Nice on-topic post. Yet another anal-fetisher heard from...

David A. Smith

On Nov 8, 9:15 am, Voltaire <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Nice on-topic post. Yet another anal-fetisher heard from...

David A. Smith

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:41:41 -0800, dlzc <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:



I thought it was "Why do apes with degree's think they know
everything?"

Seems like EVERYBODY is big on ego-ism on the net, and
especially in physics.