Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena...

RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena... - Physics Forum

RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena... - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:23 AM
NovaJoe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena...



The relativity of motion in space relative to the inertia phenomena is
a subject that no one can seem to agree upon. It seems no one can make
up their mind either. But, if we all we to take a deep breath, and
approach this difficulty by thinking "outside the box," we would find
there is an easy way to go about this difficulty. Let's go back to
the basics and see what we can come up with. Assuming motion cannot
exist without reference, the first thing that needs to be done is we
need to define motion relative to the inertia phenomena. Let us
simplify this statement by saying, "We need to define motion in space
relative to space" (spatial reference) If we imagine the universe in a
perpetual orbit, from the perspective of watching the universe from
outside the universe, how are we to know if the universe is spinning
in perpetual
orbit, or are we orbiting the universe while the universe stands
still? There is no motion to define here relative to an orbital
motion without a third body of reference. The only motion that can be
defined under these conditions is the motion of the expansion of the
universe. Now were beginning to get a picture. How are we to modify
a postulate for the functionality of the inertia phenomena by using
this
deduction? Assume that inertial mass and gravitational mass are
equivalent. Inertial mass is relative to velocity in space, so must
gravitational.

These assumptions clearly dictate a need for, as we refer to in RHU
Theory, a positive uniformed motion or PUM for short (universal
spatial expansion of all matter throughout the universe with the
perceived velocity of light). If this were the case, then we could
explain the curvature of space in the presence of mass proprietary to
the warping of space relative to velocity approaching the speed of
light. According to the warping of space relative to velocity
approaching the speed of light, the space in front of the direction of
motion expands, while the space opposite to the direction of motion
contracts creating a resistance opposite to the direction of motion.
If matter did expand uniformly with the perceived velocity of light it
is possible that the PUM (positive uniformed motion) could create an
expansion of space equivocally proportionate to the universal spatial
expansion (PUM) of all matter, which would leave no reference body for
this motion to be observed. The PUM (positive uniformed motion) would
cause a curvature of space in the presents of mass, thus, the PUM
would explain the functionality of the curvature of space in the
presence of matter. This would also explain why the normally
symmetrical shape of the atom experiences a contraction relative to
direction when put into motion approaching the perceived velocity of
light. Not only that, but this postulation explains why gravity is a
universal medium. Under this postulation of a PUM (positive uniformed
motion) when two or more atoms are clustered together the combined
velocity of the atoms expansion motion is obviously greater the more
atoms clustered together in any particular body increasing the
curvature of space in the immediate vicinity of the body relative to
the accumulated velocity of expansion. The accumulated velocity of
expansion relative to the number of atoms in a body would also
increase the downward force experienced by a person on the surface a
planet in the form of inertia relative to the accumulated velocity of
expansion proprietary to the number of atoms clustered together in a
particular body.


Yes it is true motion in space can only be defined relative to other
bodies in space, but how is motion in space referenced relative to the
inertia phenomena? This is what is meant when I say we need to define
motion in space relative to space (spatial reference/ universe as a
hole). There must be a reference body for the inertia phenomena or
the inertia phenomena would not exist because motion does not exist
without reference.


It is known that space warps relative to velocity approaching the
speed of light. Space expands in the direction of motion, while the
space opposite to the direction of motion contracts creating a
resistance opposite to the direction of motion. The greater the
velocity of a body of mass is approaching the speed of light (in a
vacuum) the greater the overall mass of the body becomes (increase in
mass relative to acceleration in velocity). The property of matter
experiencing an increase in overall mass associated with velocity in
space ("in space" because all motion in reality is in space/all
physical matter exist in space weather surrounded matter or not all
matter exist in space) is the connection in implying, because: this
suggest mass needs to be in motion for gravity to exist. Which raises
the question," how is velocity referenced relative to the warping of
space associated with velocity approaching the speed of light (inertia
phenomena)?" There must be a reference of motion in space relative to
the inertia phenomena. Understanding the connection between matter
(mass), inertia and the reference (also the need to define this
reference) of the inertia phenomena is fundamental to understanding
gravity, the curvature of space in the presence of mass, the
acceleration of the expansion of the universe (the so called "dark
energy"). My theory (Relativistic-Hyper-Unification Theory or RHU
Theory for short) defines the reference of the inertia phenomena, the
motion of the matter/mass (universal spatial expansion of all mass in
the universe spherically outward with the velocity of light, which
becomes the third reference unto which all other motion is defined
relative to the inertia phenomena), among numerous other difficulties
solved or explained by my theory (Relativistic-Hyper-Unification or
RHU Theory). The universal spatial expansion of mass with the
velocity of light is the reason for universal gravitation. The
universal special expansion of all mass in the universe with the
velocity of light sounds like a pipe dream the first time you imagine
matter expanding at the speed of light because we don't observe this
motion in reality. However, if space expanded equivocally
proportional relative to the expansion of mass so that two separated
bodies in space would not appear to be getting closer to each other so
long as two bodies are far enough away from each other so that gravity
is not a factor. Under these conditions the expansion of space
associated with the expansion of matter would be impossible to observe
relative to the lack of reference. The universal spatial expansion of
mass (PUM) velocity would have to be a continuously accelerated
velocity relative to the unit of measurement continuously expanding
with the expansion of space (associated with the expansion of
matter). Under these conditions the expansion velocity of mass would
be required to accelerate in order to maintain an equivalent
perception of inertia from moment to moment. If the expansion
velocity of mass was a constant unvarying velocity gravity would
appear to weaken over time. As the unit of measurement expands with
space and matter/mass inertial phenomena would weaken without
acceleration that maintains a velocity equivalent to our perception of
a 186,000 miles per/sec from moment to moment maintaining an
equivalent perception of gravity and space from moment to moment.
Although our perception of one mile remains constant (under these
conditions), the reality is the unite of measurement continuously
increases in volume requiring the expansion velocity of mass to
accelerate in order to maintain equivalent perception of inertial
phenomena (gravity) relative to the increasing unite of measurement.
This hypothesis is supported by the acceleration of the expansion of
the universe. Proven through experiment suggested and carried out by,
Saul Perlmutter with the Lawrence Berkley national laboratory. He
suggested 100 or more type 1-A supernovas be photographed so that they
could decipher the deceleration ratio of the expansion of the
universe. They discovered the expansion of the universe was
accelerating. They recorded a 20% increase in velocity of expansion
since the big bang, and of course no one was expecting this (except
for me) leading to hypothesis of some unknown force repelling bodies
of matter on opposing sides of great expanses of empty space called
"dark energy". This is consistent with my hypothesis on the PUM
(universal spatial expansion of all mass throughout the universe with
the perceived velocity of light). In accordance with the Lorentz
Transformation, the velocity of light would be perceived at 186,000
miles per/sec now AND shortly after the big bang. However, if we
could measure the velocity of light shortly after the big bang from
the present time and compare that velocity with our (present time)
perception of the velocity of light we would find the velocity of
light has been decelerating related to the acceleration in velocity of
universal spatial expansion of mass and space in accordance with the
Lorentz Transformation. The velocity of light would necessarily
decelerate when light comes in contact with matter while our
perception of the velocity of light remains equivalent throughout
time. This would be the affect on the velocity of light in accordance
with the Lorentz Transformation in association with the PUM (universal
spatial expansion of matter and space). This means light was faster,
relative to matter, the earlier in time you go towards to the birth of
the universe (the big bang). Go to [Only registered users see links. ] for
more information on RHU Theory (Relativistic-Hyper-Unification).

Note:
[Only registered users see links. ]
Physics looks for new Einstein as nature rewrites laws of universe
Times Newspapers Ltd., September 9 2001
"A GROUP of astronomers and cosmologists has warned that the laws
thought to govern the universe, including Albert Einstein's theory of
relativity, must be rewritten.....Among the ideas facing revision is
Einstein's belief that the speed of light must always be the same -
186,000 miles a second in a vacuum. There is growing evidence that
light moved much faster during the early stages of our universe.
Rees,
Hawking and others are so concerned at the impact of such ideas that
they recently organized a private conference in Cambridge for more
than 30 leading cosmologists.....Another puzzle is the so-called
"smoothness" of our universe, by which astronomers mean the
distribution of matter and radiation." more>>

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
inertial , phenomena , relativity , rhu , theory


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving Dimensions Theory Book Due Out in Fall 05--Very Rough Draft: 4th Dimensions Expanding Relative to 3 Spatial Dimensions jollyrogership@yahoo.com Physics Forum 64 03-31-2012 10:24 AM
FFiMP: Misconceptions about Special Relativity Jan Gooral Physics Forum 0 05-22-2008 02:53 PM
Simply put, MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY is THE NEW MODEL: http://physicsmathforums.com drelliot@gmail.com Physics Forum 0 08-29-2006 06:32 AM
Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! drelliot@gmail.com Physics Forum 1 07-06-2006 05:19 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18282 seconds with 16 queries