A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.

A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.

If we accept that the nature of non-locality is described as an
instantaneous exchange of "eigenstate" information and in addition can
have different levels of action, THEN I postulate that the quantum
mechanical universe is able to MIMIC relativity rules down to only a
few anomalies, which should be measurable by experiment. The different
levels of EPR action should be present between evaporated silver atoms
inside a Stern Gerlach experiment, or inside a classic EPR experiment,
or even at very long distance between ( anti)copy universes. See:
[Only registered users see links. ]
The consequence of this new model is, that the lightspeed in a complex
way is related to the mass and gravity field of massive objects like
the Earth.As a result, there is a relative simple possibility to check
the ether DRAG at a mountain summit, by the diurnal distance variation
measurements of single GPS satellite signals by a "single GPS-
receiver".
If the lightspeed around the Earth is dragged by gravity, then light
rays that are "skimming the Earth" are supposed to be less influenced
by the motion of the Earth. Thus GPS signals that are skimming the
Earth surface are also less influenced and will show at least diurnal
variation related to the orbital motion of the earth.
There is perhaps even a chance to find "some" universal variation, as
is measured by Dayton Miller .

See my proposal with sketch at:
[Only registered users see links. ]


Small lightspeed anomalies, are already measured at mountain summits
in parallel direction with the Earth's orbital motion around the Sun
by Dayton Miller ( 1925-1928) and Yuri Galaev (Ukrain) , however due
to the very small variations, these results are still ignored by the
mainstream.A second interesting way to measure the ether speed was
performed by Y Galaev in 2002:THE MEASURING OF ETHER-DRIFT VELOCITY
AND KINEMATIC ETHER ISCOSITY WITHIN OPTICAL WAVES BANDPublished:
Spacetime and Substance, Vol.3, No.5 (15), 2002, P.207-224. Author: -
Yuri Galaev, Ph.D.; Senior research officer of the Institute for
Radiophysics & Electronics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
and corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences
(RANS). see:[Only registered users see links. ]
0015-pdf.zip

MASS IN MOTION
needs a particle MEMORY system to memorize "Lorentz polarization" or
"Fermion Consciousness".

If we imagine that in such a dense vacuum lattice, mass has to be able
to move and accelerate, then we need something very special to keep a
tennis ball in motion after it is hit by your racket. We need to
introduce a Higgs oscillating vacuum Lattice, which we could call
"COMPLEXIFIED Lorentz space" able to push or pull spinning Fermion
propellers and transform complete atoms to create "REAL Lorentz
dilation in time" but NO "Lorentz CONTRACTION".
Why? Because if we assume that gravity is dragging the lightspeed with
the Earth, then all the Michelson-Morley apparatusses should have
shown a diurnal effect!! originated solely by the contraction of the
apparatus itself!!
Thus ONLY "Lorentz TIME DELATION is real" and the logical result of a
quantum mechanical Higgs-Fermion collison process.
In other words, I would call these particles: "Lorentz polarized"
Fermion propeller particles with a double spin state, able to absorb
more "Casimir" vacuum energy from behind than from the front side.
( see Figure B) below.
HOWEVER in that case, every Fermion should have some sort of a
Memory :
I suggest the symmetrical Big Bang ENTANGLEMENT MEMORY is still acting
between two or more IDENTICAL but CPT ( Charge Parity and Time)
symmetric Universes to solve the so called "Schroedingers CAT problem"
and also the "Lorentz polarization" memory !!
Seconly, we should consider, that massive objects like the Earth will
drag their own peculiar reference frame with them. This is called
"LASOF""Local anti-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame", the origin
of small Radar reflection anomalies of Venus and Mercury.( described
later in this book). see:
[Only registered users see links. ]


On 11 okt, 19:24, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

MASS IN MOTION
needs a particle MEMORY system to memorize "Lorentz polarization" or
"Fermion Consciousness".

If we imagine that in such a dense vacuum lattice, mass has to be able
to move and accelerate, then we need something very special to keep a
tennis ball in motion after it is hit by your racket. We need to
introduce a Higgs oscillating vacuum Lattice, which we could call
"COMPLEXIFIED Lorentz space" able to push or pull spinning Fermion
propellers and transform complete atoms to create "REAL Lorentz
dilation in time" but NO "Lorentz CONTRACTION".
Why? Because if we assume that gravity is dragging the lightspeed with
the Earth, then all the Michelson-Morley apparatusses should have
shown a diurnal effect!! originated solely by the contraction of the
apparatus itself!!
Thus ONLY "Lorentz TIME DELATION is real" and the logical result of a
quantum mechanical Higgs-Fermion collison process.
In other words, I would call these particles: "Lorentz polarized"
Fermion propeller particles with a double spin state, able to absorb
more "Casimir" vacuum energy from behind than from the front side.
( see Figure B) below.
HOWEVER in that case, every Fermion should have some sort of a
Memory :
I suggest the symmetrical Big Bang ENTANGLEMENT MEMORY is still acting
between two or more IDENTICAL but CPT ( Charge Parity and Time)
symmetric Universes to solve the so called "Schroedingers CAT problem"
and also the "Lorentz polarization" memory !!
Seconly, we should consider, that massive objects like the Earth will
drag their own peculiar reference frame with them. This is called
"LASOF""Local anti-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame", the origin
of small Radar reflection anomalies of Venus and Mercury.( described
later in this book). see:
[Only registered users see links. ]


On 11 okt, 19:24, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

L> MASS IN MOTION
L> needs a particle MEMORY system to memorize "Lorentz polarization" or
L> "Fermion Consciousness".

Take a Tennis Ball and a Bannana and strap a couple of walnut sized ion
Engines to them, set them off in the direction of ether space (away from the
milky way toward deep space), which one will get to Light Speed First ?

L> MASS IN MOTION
L> needs a particle MEMORY system to memorize "Lorentz polarization" or
L> "Fermion Consciousness".

Take a Tennis Ball and a Bannana and strap a couple of walnut sized ion
Engines to them, set them off in the direction of ether space (away from the
milky way toward deep space), which one will get to Light Speed First ?

My open letter dated 16 october 2007 to professor Langley.

Dear professor Langley,

I am aware of your magnificent work on high precision GPS Point
positioning models.
In my own -fully different- QM vacuum research, I came to surprising
conclusions about the origin of strong outliers in GPS signals which
are supported by your TOPEX-POSEIDON and CHAMP pseudorange residuals
up to 5 meters, which I found inside articles mentioned below
I came to the (anti-relativistic) conclusion, that the Earth's orbital
speed, ca. 30 km/sec, should be incorporated in the GPS signal speed.
The effect should be a GPS-LEO pseudorange residual decrease of max 3
meters.
My vacuum model predict that; If GPS signals are not directly pointing
into the surface of the massive gravitating Earth then the orbital
speed of the Earth should be accounted for.

Thus for ground based receivers this is mostly not the case.
On Earth, this effect should be measurable only on mountain summits or
high riser buildings. (see attachment) and also on internet:
[Only registered users see links. ]
and perhaps:
[Only registered users see links. ]

ps. This is an open letter also visible on other locations.

I hope you like it.

Leo Vuyk.

Your articles which I see As a support of the vacuum effect mentioned
above:
Evaluation of High-Precision, Single-Frequency GPS Point Positioning
Models (2001)
[Only registered users see links. ]
GPS Phase-Connected, Precise Point Positioning
of Low Earth Orbiters (2004)
[Only registered users see links. ]

by Tomas Beran, Sunil B. Bisnath and Richard B. Langley
University of New Brunswick Ca.

My open letter dated 16 october 2007 to professor Langley.

Dear professor Langley,

I am aware of your magnificent work on high precision GPS Point
positioning models.
In my own -fully different- QM vacuum research, I came to surprising
conclusions about the origin of strong outliers in GPS signals which
are supported by your TOPEX-POSEIDON and CHAMP pseudorange residuals
up to 5 meters, which I found inside articles mentioned below
I came to the (anti-relativistic) conclusion, that the Earth's orbital
speed, ca. 30 km/sec, should be incorporated in the GPS signal speed.
The effect should be a GPS-LEO pseudorange residual decrease of max 3
meters.
My vacuum model predict that; If GPS signals are not directly pointing
into the surface of the massive gravitating Earth then the orbital
speed of the Earth should be accounted for.

Thus for ground based receivers this is mostly not the case.
On Earth, this effect should be measurable only on mountain summits or
high riser buildings. (see attachment) and also on internet:
[Only registered users see links. ]
and perhaps:
[Only registered users see links. ]

ps. This is an open letter also visible on other locations.

I hope you like it.

Leo Vuyk.

Your articles which I see As a support of the vacuum effect mentioned
above:
Evaluation of High-Precision, Single-Frequency GPS Point Positioning
Models (2001)
[Only registered users see links. ]
GPS Phase-Connected, Precise Point Positioning
of Low Earth Orbiters (2004)
[Only registered users see links. ]

by Tomas Beran, Sunil B. Bisnath and Richard B. Langley
University of New Brunswick Ca.

On Oct 16, 8:11 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

There seems to be two different shaped LASOF ( local anti-symmetrical
oscillating vacuum frame) lightspeed extinction envelopes, for A:
Earth bound light sources and for B: Satellite- or space based light
sources.
Based on Radar reflection data of Venus and Mercury done by I.I
Shapiro, I concluded, that for Earth bound light sources, the LASOF
extinction envelope around the Earth, seems to be globular with a
diameter of 70 million km. see:
[Only registered users see links. ]

Based on sparse Formosat- Champ- Topex satellite data in combination
with the small anomalies measured by D.Miller ( 1926) and Y.Galaev, I
suggest, that for space based light sources, the LASOF envelope seems
to be ellipsoidal (or cigar shaped), with the major axis coinciding to
the Earth-Satellite axis of the same length ( 70 MILLION KM) and an
unknown minor axis.
Future satellite-GPS distance reading variations should give
information about the minor axis of the cigar shaped LASOF envelope.
[Only registered users see links. ]

Leo Vuyk

On Oct 16, 8:11 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

There seems to be two different shaped LASOF ( local anti-symmetrical
oscillating vacuum frame) lightspeed extinction envelopes, for A:
Earth bound light sources and for B: Satellite- or space based light
sources.
Based on Radar reflection data of Venus and Mercury done by I.I
Shapiro, I concluded, that for Earth bound light sources, the LASOF
extinction envelope around the Earth, seems to be globular with a
diameter of 70 million km. see:
[Only registered users see links. ]

Based on sparse Formosat- Champ- Topex satellite data in combination
with the small anomalies measured by D.Miller ( 1926) and Y.Galaev, I
suggest, that for space based light sources, the LASOF envelope seems
to be ellipsoidal (or cigar shaped), with the major axis coinciding to
the Earth-Satellite axis of the same length ( 70 MILLION KM) and an
unknown minor axis.
Future satellite-GPS distance reading variations should give
information about the minor axis of the cigar shaped LASOF envelope.
[Only registered users see links. ]

Leo Vuyk

For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry
of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:
[Only registered users see links. ]