A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.

For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry
of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:
[Only registered users see links. ]

On Nov 6, 2:27 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

"Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of
about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968,
page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below.
Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital
Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity
influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see
below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov,
(Binary HV 2543).
[Only registered users see links. ]

On Nov 6, 2:27 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

"Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of
about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968,
page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below.
Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital
Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity
influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see
below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov,
(Binary HV 2543).
[Only registered users see links. ]

On Nov 7, 1:51 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF
idea, I searched and found new impressive data.
It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near
or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more
by the Solar frame.
In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters.
A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth
Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called
Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not
possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer
programs are needed to compensate these errors.
However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed
is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to
vanish for a great deal.
I made a copy with my comment see:
[Only registered users see links. ]

The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise
orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae-
Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See:
[Only registered users see links. ]

Leo Vuyk.

On Nov 7, 1:51 pm, "[Only registered users see links. ]" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF
idea, I searched and found new impressive data.
It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near
or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more
by the Solar frame.
In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters.
A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth
Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called
Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not
possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer
programs are needed to compensate these errors.
However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed
is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to
vanish for a great deal.
I made a copy with my comment see:
[Only registered users see links. ]

The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise
orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae-
Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See:
[Only registered users see links. ]

Leo Vuyk.