Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics - Physics Forum

Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:38 PM
Captain Ranger McCoy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics



Why is it that String Theorists continue to get millions upon millions
in funding to support Lubos Motl, Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, and Paul
Davies?

How can a subject which has not one physical formula, nor physical
prediction, nor physical postulate, nor physical test be considered
physics?

In Not Even Wrong, The Failure of String Theory and The Search For
Unity in Physical Law, Peter Woit writes, "Instead of sneering at the
supposedly masturbatory activities of mathematicians, physicists
should perhaps consider whether George Orwell's rather nasty remark
about political thinking among leftists might not equally apply to
much of modern particle theory: `Political thought, especially on the
left, is a sort of masturbation fantasy in which the world of fact
hardly matters.'"

Dan Friedan, the son of feminist Betty Friedan and one of the founders
of String Theory, who received a MacArthur foundation "genius" grant
in 1987 for his work related to String Theory recently wrote, "String
theory has no credibility as a candidate theory of physics.
Recognizing failure is a userful part of the scientific strategy. Only
when failure is recognized can dead ends be abandoned and useable
pieces of failed programs be recycled. Aside from possible utility,
there is a responsibility to recognize failure. Recognizing failure is
an essential part of the scientific ethos. Complete scientific failure
must be recognized eventually."

And even with all of this, discussing any other theory that is not the
none-theory of string theory will get you banned from discussion
groups, and will be met with silence from aging theorists. The
physicist John Baez has created a snarky "crackpot index" which he
uses as a tool to keep out any new theories other than ST & LQG (both
of which score extraordinarily high on his crackpot index), for Baez
lacks the humility and integrity of Einstein who realized that
"imagination is more important than knowledge," "if at first, the idea
is not absurd, then there is no hope for it," and "Great spirits have
always encountered opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind
is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to
conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions
courageously and honestly."
So it is that the indie physicist is cast out and kicked by the
burgeoning, snarky physics bureaucracy who performed well on their
math SATs, hung out in Aspen, and then failed to go much further.
In Not Even Wrong, The Failure of String Theory and The Search For
Unity in Physical Law, Peter Woit writes, "Since 1973, the field has
failed to make significant progress, and in many ways has been the
victim of its own success. The resons for this failure will be
examined, and an attempt will also be made to extract lessons from the
history of previous successes that may indicate a more promising way
forward."
Smolin writes, "The story I will tell could be read by some as a
tragedy. To put it bluntly-and to give away the punchline-we have
failed. We inherited a science, physics, that had been progressing so
fast for so long that it was often taken as the model for how other
kinds of science should be done. . . But today, despite our best
efforts, what we know for certain about these laws is no more than
what we knew back in the 1970s. -Lee Smolin, The Trouble with Physics:
The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of Science, and What Comes Next, p
viii, Introduction.
Woit also quotes Marx, "The bourgeoise cannot exist without constantly
revolutionizing the instruments of production." -Karl Marx, The
Communist Manifesto
Even though it might have very little to do with science, string
theory does have its benefits: In Not Even Wrong, Peter Woit writes,
"A superstring theorist looking for a pleasant place to spend a week
or so at someone else's expense will in most years have a choice of
thirty or so conferences, many in exotic locations. In 2002, for
example, among the most difficult and prestigious to arrange options
was a summer workshop in Aspen, but during the year, other possible
destinations were Santa Barbara, Chile, Trieste, Genoa, the Black Sae,
Corsica, Paris, Berlin, Vancouver, Seoul, Chuna, and many others,
including Baku in Azerbaijan."

And that is why Moving Dimenions Theory is not considered science. But
because it serves logic and reason, as opposed to government
bureaucracies that fly snarky pomo hipsters to Aspen conferences, MDT
is science.

Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all
experimental tests and phenomena associated with special and general
relativity. MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena
as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The
genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model
which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.

Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for
quantum entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these
derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor
LQG account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length
contraction. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical
reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.

Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a
physical theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies
formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.

THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

The first step to recovery is admitting there is a problem.

Thanks Dr. Smolin!!

Here are some quotes from your rockin' book and my responses:

"Thus all the theories that triumphed had consequences for experiment
that were simple to work out and could be tested within a few years.
This does not mean that the theories could solved exactly-most
theories never are. But it does mean that physical insight lead
immediately to a prediction of a new physical effect." -Lee Smolin,
The trouble With Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of
Science, and What Comes Next

While MDT doesn't predict a new physical effect, it does explain
physical phenomena such as entanglement and action-at-a-distance as
never before. Furthermore, it also unifies GR and QM with a simple
physical model. Also, it shows that quantum mechanical and
relativistic phenomena derive from the same underlying physical
reality-a fourth dimension that is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions.

"Whatever else one says about string theory, loop quantum gravity, and
other approaches, they have not delivered on that front. The standard
excuse has been that experiments on this scale are impossible to
perform-but, as we've seen, this is not the case. So there must be
another reason. I believe there is something basic we are all missing,
some wrong assumption we are all making. If this is so, then we need
to isolate the wrong assumption and replace it with a new idea." -Lee
Smolin, The trouble With Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall
of Science, and What Comes Next

The wrong assumption originates from the confusion of time with the
fourth dimension. Time is not the fourth dimension, but it is an
emergent phenomenon that arises from a fourth dimension that is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Time inherits
certain properties of the fourth dimension, but the over-extending of
the dimensionality of time has lead to troubling and ridiculous
situations such as Godel's block universe, wherein time is frozen; and
wherein the past, present, and future already exist.

The fourth dimension expands at the rate of c in units of the Planck
length. Thus macroscopic objects rarely ever enter into the fourth
expanding dimension deeper than the Planck length. A photon is matter
that surfs the expanding fourth dimension, jumping from crest to crest
of all the tiny expansions of the fourth dimension which manifest
themselves as spheres in the three spatial dimensions. Thus a photon
appears as a spherically expanding wavefront in the three spatial
dimensions. Furthermore, a photon does not age as it stays in the
exact same place in the fourth expanding dimension, causing it to
translate with a velocity of c in the three spatial dimensions.

"What could that wrong assumption be? My guess is that it involves two
things: the foundations of quantum mechanics and the nature of time.
We have already discussed the first; I find it hopeful that new ideas
about quantum mechanics have been proposed recently, motivated by
studies of quantum gravity. But I strongly suspect that the key is
time. More and more, I have the feeling that quantum theory and
general relativity are both deeply wrong about the nature of time. It
is not enough to combine them. There is a deeper problem, perhaps
going back to the origin of physics." -Lee Smolin, The trouble With
Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of Science, and What
Comes Next

MDT takes us back to the origin of physics, and it presents us with a
fundamental view of reality that conforms to all experimental
evidence, while not only resolving the paradoxes of the non-locality
of the EPR effect and Godel's block universe, but unifying the
resolution within a simple physical postulate. Before Einstein's
relativity, space and time (as well as matter and energy) were
considered to be disparate entities. Einstein's relativity united
them, and suddenly time was mistakenly seen as the fourth dimension,
rather than as an emergent property of a fourth dimension expanding
relative to three spatial dimensions. Then, when Einstein correctly
saw that all moving objects are shortened when energy is added-when
they are rotated out of the three spatial dimensions and into a fourth
dimension-just as a far-away ruler appears shortened as it is rotated,
Einstein had the genius to call upon a the four-dimensional
formulation of space time.

However, this lead to confusion; as Einstein did not see that
macroscopic objects-rest masses-never enter the fourth dimension
deeper than the Planck length. Hence the past and future do not yet
exist, but only the present. Nor did Einstein realize that the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions-simple
postulate with far-reaching consequences.

"Around the beginning of the seventeenth century, Descartes and
Galileo made a wonderful discovery: You could draw a graph, with one
axis being space and the other being time. A motion through space then
becomes a curve on the graph. In this way, time is represented as if
it were another dimension of space. Motion is frozen, and a whole
history of constant motion and change is presented to us as something
static and unchanging. If I had to guess (and guessing is what I do
for a living), this is the scene of the crime". -Lee Smolin, The
trouble With Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of Science,
and What Comes Next

MDT unfreezes time, liberating us all with free will-the free will to
move beyond ST & LQG, which are not inextricably locked into the fixed
future of the block universe as Brain Green and Paul Davies would have
you suppose. Neither the future nor the past exists. Motion is
inherent in the underlying four-dimensional space-time geometry, as
the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
Einstein noted that all objects are moving through space-time at the
velocity c. This never changes. An object stationary in the three
spatial dimensions is translating through the fourth dimension at the
rate of c. An object stationary in the fourth dimension-a photon-is
translating through the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c.
Hence it is obvious that the fourth dimension is expanding relative to
the three spatial dimensions.
String Theory's greatest contribution to physics has been the utter
rejection of the obvious, the denial of common sense, and the
institutionalization of thousands of mediocrities to ignore or shout-
down any physics that might get in the way of their vast commercial
industries which must trump truth-their salaries, benefits, and
science-fiction books. Indeed, ST gives full license to make one's
ignorance one's arrogance, and thus it is the breeding ground for
those with ambitions overshadowing their talents.

"We have to find a way to unfreeze time-to represent time without
turning it into space. I have to idea how to do this. I can't conceive
of a mathematics that doesn't represent a world as if it were frozen
it eternity. It's terribly hard to represent time, and that's why
there's a good chance this representation is the missing piece." -Lee
Smolin, The trouble With Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall
of Science, and What Comes Next

There actually is no problem with the representation of time in
physical theories, but only within the interpretations and
extrapolations of modern theorists. Time, as it is defined, works
perfectly in quantum mechanics and relativity, as it does in Newtonian
mechanics and classical electrodynamics. Hence our cars and computers
which work perfectly well each and every day.
However, when the notion of time is warped and extrapolated to suit
the fantasies of prominent physicists who ignore login, reason, and
experiment, in order to create wormholes and time machines, it only
goes to show that time is not the fourth dimension, but an emergent
property of a universe wherein a fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions.

"One thing is clear: I can't get anywhere thinking about this problem
within the confines of string theory. Since string theory is limited
to the description of strings and branes moving in fixed background
spacetime geometries, it offers nothing for someone who wants to break
new ground thinking about the nature of time or of quantum theory.
Background-independent approaches offer a better starting point,
because they have already transcended the classical pictures of space
and time. And they are simple to define and easy to play with." -Lee
Smolin, The trouble With Physics, The Rise of String Theory, The Fall
of Science, and What Comes Next

Indeed String Theory has banned asking the questions that MDT
addresses, such as "What is the nature of the physical framework
underlying the observed phenomena of relativity and quantum
mechanics?" String theory has bred an entire generation of physicists
who believe that politics, hype, and name-calling are to be preferred
over logic, reason, and truth to advance physics. Sting Theory, though
funded with hundreds of millions, yet lacks the simple truth and
beauty of this postulate-"the fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions."

"I won't say any more about this, because I want to move on to a
different question. Suppose an intellectually ambitious young person
with an original and impatient mind wants to think deeply about the
five great questions. Given our failure to solve any of them, I can't
imagine why such a person would want to be limited to working in any
of the current research programs. Clearly, if string theory or loop
quantum gravity by themselves were the answer, we would know it by
now. They may be starting points, they may be parts of the answer,
they may contain necessary lessons. But the right theory must contain
new elements, which our ambitious young person is perhaps uniquely
qualified to search for." -Lee Smolin, The trouble With Physics, The
Rise of String Theory, The Fall of Science, and What Comes Next

Perhaps the excessive funding of theories never backed by experiment
has resulted in institutions that now oppose the advancement of
physics. With mortgages to be paid and families to be supported, who
can afford truth and beauty after investing thirty years into
mythology and group-think? Smolin is to be commended for firing a
warning shot across the bow of all young physicists-letting them know
that they, if they are to be true physicists, are essentially on their
own. For the advancement of science has ever been the domain of the
individual, as has the creation of all lasting art, philosophy,
literature, and culture. Make no mistake-the individual truth seeker
is not alone in the context of the greats-they stand upon the
shoulders of giants-but they are often alone in the context of their
contemporaries. String Theory, by deconstructing great physicists and
science, has tried to invert this, placing politics over philosophy
and money over meaning, and that is why they are destined to fail. For
as Shakespeare said, "foul deeds will rise, thou all the earth
overwhelm them, to men's eyes."

"What has my generation has bequeathed to these young scientists?
Ideas and techniques they may or may not want to use, together with a
cautionary tale of partial success in several directions, resulting in
a general failure to finish the job Einstein started a hundred years
ago. The worst thing we could do would be to hold them back by
insisting that they work on our ideas. So the question for the last
part of the book is a question I ask myself every morning: Are we
doing all we can to support and encourage young scientist-and, by the
virtue of this, ourselves-to transcend what we have done these last
thirty years and find the true theory that solves the five greatest
problems in physics?" -Lee Smolin, The trouble With Physics, The Rise
of String Theory, The Fall of Science, and What Comes Next

I would encourage young physicists to spend a couple hours reviewing
Moving Dimensions Theory. It already answers two of Smolin's "five
great questions."

[Only registered users see links. ]

The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

This simple postulate offers a physical model underlying and
unifiying:

RELATIVITY:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation
3) the equivalence of mass and energy
4) the constant velocity of light
5) the independence of the speed of light from the velocity of the
source

QUANTUMN MECHANICS
1) action at a distance
2) wave-particle duality
3) interference phenomena
4) EPR paradox

THERMODYNAMICS
1) Time's arrow
2) Entropy

STRING THEORY'S MANY DIMENSIONS / KALUZA/KLEIN THEORY
1) a fourth expanding dimension can be interepreted as many
dimensions, each time it expands

THE UNITY OF THE DUALITIES
1) wave/particle duality
2) time/space duality
3) energy/mass duality
4) E/B duality

GENERAL RELATIVITY
1) Gravitational redshift
2) Gravity waves
3) Gravitation attraction

THE SPACE-TIME BACKGROUND
1) quantum foam
2) the smearing of space and time at small distances
3) Hawking's imaginary time

PARADOXES
1) MDT explains away Godel's Block Universe
2) MDT unfreezes time
3) Resolves Zeno's Paradox

ONE GETS ALL OF THIS FROM A SIMPLE POSTULATE:

The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions in a sphereically symmetric manner, in units of the Planck
length, at the rate of c.

This means that every point in three dimnesional space is always
expanding into a fourth dimensional sphere with a radius of the plank
length. A photon is mater caught on the surface of this quantized
expansion, and thus energy is quantized. The expansion of the fourth
dimension occurs at the rate of c, and thus he velocity of all photons
is c.

Check out the t-shirt with a simple proof of MDT:

[Only registered users see links. ]

"The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at
the speed of light through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the
fourth dimension is expanding at the rate of c relative to the three
spatial dimenions."

How sad it is that when truth stares modern physicists in the face,
they must close their eyes so as to get a postdoc or raise more funds
for String Theory.

Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all
experimental tests and phenomena associated with special and general
relativity. MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena
as predicted by quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive
experiments. The genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a
common physical model which shows that phenomena from both relativity
and quantum mechanics derive from the same fundamental physical
reality.

Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for
quantum entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these
derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor
LQG account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length
contraction. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical
reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of
light, nor the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of
the source, nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from
the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor
Loop Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe
which troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.

Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a
physical theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies
formerly disparate phenomena within a simple context.

THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.

If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein

But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from
which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence
of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name

I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all
this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood

I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood

Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood

MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to
account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.

Questions Addressed by MDT:

Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to
the three spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding
fourth dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the
photon is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the
fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. Thus c is always independent of the movement of the
source.

Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.

Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time
is inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In
all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.

How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the
photon's momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension
and trapping it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it
appears as a localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens
a
grain on a photographic plate.

How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by
the electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the
electron its wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up
the net probability that the combine momenergy will be in the
expanding fourth dimension. The more photons one adds to an object,
the greater the chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth
dimension, and thus it moves.

Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too,
they are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding
dimension.

Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no
photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock
is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or
an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=no time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of
light
cannot emit a photon.

How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the
fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact
same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.

Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?

Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a
rotation into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more
photons it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the
expanding fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as
perceived from the three spatial dimensions.

Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension.
Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=mc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating
at the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.

Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner.
Hence every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons,
is naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.

Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling
at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension,
appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the
velocity
c.

Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=s^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with
the
velocity of light.

What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.

What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum
mechanics, and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies
Newton's
laws.

Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons
prefer the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the
greater the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the
fourth expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the
shorter it appears, and the faster it moves.

How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists

"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-
Abner Shimony and John Clauser

Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists,
such as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that
physics need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that
two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides
the
new concept of space-time.

"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum
and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell

Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal.
The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that
two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides
the
new concept of space-time.

"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of
quantum mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger

"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum
and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell

Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal.
The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that
two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides
the
new concept of space-time.

"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of
quantum mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger

The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that
two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same...

[Only registered users see links. ]

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2007, 04:44 AM
Bill Hobba
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics


"Captain Ranger McCoy" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1188059920.096332.155840@z24g2000prh.googlegr oups.com...

They don't. A more interesting question is why you don't stop regurgitating
the same rot.


It has plenty eg the relativistic action of a classical string.

Rest of usual junk snipped.

Bill


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2007, 04:44 AM
Bill Hobba
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics


"Captain Ranger McCoy" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1188059920.096332.155840@z24g2000prh.googlegr oups.com...

They don't. A more interesting question is why you don't stop regurgitating
the same rot.


It has plenty eg the relativistic action of a classical string.

Rest of usual junk snipped.

Bill


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2007, 02:34 PM
Sam Wormley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics& Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

Captain Ranger McCoy wrote:

Maybe you are pursuing the wrong ideas, bubba!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-26-2007, 02:34 PM
Sam Wormley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics& Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

Captain Ranger McCoy wrote:

Maybe you are pursuing the wrong ideas, bubba!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2007, 11:17 AM
ny2292000
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

On Aug 26, 10:34 am, Sam Wormley <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

I found a link to something I wrote a long time about Moving
Dimensions..

The link is below

[Only registered users see links. ]

Cheers,

MP

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2007, 11:17 AM
ny2292000
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

On Aug 26, 10:34 am, Sam Wormley <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

I found a link to something I wrote a long time about Moving
Dimensions..

The link is below

[Only registered users see links. ]

Cheers,

MP

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2007, 07:00 PM
Captain Ranger McCoy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

MDT is the best-tested theory of all time.



MDT predicts that an object's velocity through spacetime is always c.
This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the three spatial
dimensions is to move with a velocity of c relative to the fourth
expanding dimension. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the fourth
expanding dimension is to move with the velocity c relative to the
three spatial dimensions. This is because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





MDT predicts the equivalence of mass and energy. Matter, when rotated
into the fourth expanding dimension, appears as photons.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts the constant speed of light. The fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c.
Hence the speed of matter rotated into the the fourth dimension is c.
No matter how fast the source is moving, the second the photon leaves
thes ource, it is carried by the fourth expanding dimension, so its
speed is always c, independent of the source.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts wave-particle duality. As matter expands in the fourth
dimension in the form of a photon, it appears as a spherically-
symmetric wavefront. Hence Young's double-slit experiment and
interference. When the wave--the matter being carried along by the
fourth expanding dimension--is perturbed, it is collapsed, and brought
into the the three stationary spatial dimensions. Hence the quantum
nature of all energy.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts entropy--the fundamental motion of the universe is the
spherically-symmetric wavefront defiend by the fourth dimenion
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions--hence entropy. Two
particles at a similar origin have a probability to move apart.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





Hence all radiation fundamentally appears as spheircally-symmetric
wavefronts propagating in the three stationary spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts the null vector for photons, as well as the - (minus)
sign in the space-time metric. As the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions, the only way to have zero
interval is to move with the origin--at the speed of light.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





MDT unfreezes time. Time, as we consider it, is not the fourth
dimension, but it is an emrgent property of a fourth dimension
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. This confusion of
time with the actual fourth dimension has lead to Godel's paradox and
the block-universe, which although they have provided Paul Davies with
a lucrative living for his fantasies and science fiction, are not
real. Barbour gets close to this.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



General Relativity freezes the fourth expanding dimension--it is a
tiny loop at each given instant, but one second later, that loop has a
radius of 186,000 miles.



Moving dimensions theory predicts that as objects move, they will
become shorter. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions, so as an object is rotated
into the fourth dimension, it will appear shorter in the three spatial
dimensions, and too, it will translate or gain velocity in the
direction of its forshortening.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment, including the Michelson Morely experiment.





Moving dimensions theory predicts that the measurement of the state of
a photon can instaneously affect the state of a distant photon, when
those two photons were initially interacting. This is because although
they are now distant in space, they are yet at the same place in the
expanding fourth dimension.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT does not predict wormholes, nor multiverses, nor stringy strings,
nor M-theroy, which have never been supported by experiment, and thus
it is to be utterly detested by the machine. MDT would underly all
apsects of String Theory, and MDT does explain an interpretation of
higher, numerous dimensions, if needed by Kaluza Klein et al.



In fact, an instanaeous snapshot of the foruth expanding dimension
would look something like this--every point is becoming a three-
dimensional sphere in units of the planck radius:



http://images.google.com/url?q=http:...uzF7PJ7broOFww



MDT predicts the gravitational red shift. A photon emitted in a region
of streched spacetime will maintain its wavelength as it travels away
from the mass, thus appearing red-shifted.



MDT unifies the dualities--space and time, energy and mass, waves and
particles--all can be expalined by MDT's simple postulate--the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.



Quantum mechanics, relativity, and entropy--interference, wave-
particle duality, quantized energy, time dialation, Lorentzian
contractions, the equivalence of mass and energy, and times arrow all
derive from the physical model moving dimensions theory presents.



The purpose of physics has ever been to unify and explain via deeper,
fundamental, physical models, and that's what Moving Dimensions Theory
provides.

[Only registered users see links. ]


On Aug 28, 4:17 am, ny2292000 <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2007, 07:00 PM
Captain Ranger McCoy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moving Dimensions Theory--Returning Physical Models to Physics & Unifying QM & SR & GR & Statistical Mechanics

MDT is the best-tested theory of all time.



MDT predicts that an object's velocity through spacetime is always c.
This is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the three spatial
dimensions is to move with a velocity of c relative to the fourth
expanding dimension. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts that the only way to stay stationary in the fourth
expanding dimension is to move with the velocity c relative to the
three spatial dimensions. This is because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial diemnsions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





MDT predicts the equivalence of mass and energy. Matter, when rotated
into the fourth expanding dimension, appears as photons.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts the constant speed of light. The fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c.
Hence the speed of matter rotated into the the fourth dimension is c.
No matter how fast the source is moving, the second the photon leaves
thes ource, it is carried by the fourth expanding dimension, so its
speed is always c, independent of the source.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts wave-particle duality. As matter expands in the fourth
dimension in the form of a photon, it appears as a spherically-
symmetric wavefront. Hence Young's double-slit experiment and
interference. When the wave--the matter being carried along by the
fourth expanding dimension--is perturbed, it is collapsed, and brought
into the the three stationary spatial dimensions. Hence the quantum
nature of all energy.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts entropy--the fundamental motion of the universe is the
spherically-symmetric wavefront defiend by the fourth dimenion
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions--hence entropy. Two
particles at a similar origin have a probability to move apart.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





Hence all radiation fundamentally appears as spheircally-symmetric
wavefronts propagating in the three stationary spatial dimensions.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT predicts the null vector for photons, as well as the - (minus)
sign in the space-time metric. As the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions, the only way to have zero
interval is to move with the origin--at the speed of light.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.





MDT unfreezes time. Time, as we consider it, is not the fourth
dimension, but it is an emrgent property of a fourth dimension
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. This confusion of
time with the actual fourth dimension has lead to Godel's paradox and
the block-universe, which although they have provided Paul Davies with
a lucrative living for his fantasies and science fiction, are not
real. Barbour gets close to this.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



General Relativity freezes the fourth expanding dimension--it is a
tiny loop at each given instant, but one second later, that loop has a
radius of 186,000 miles.



Moving dimensions theory predicts that as objects move, they will
become shorter. This is because the fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions, so as an object is rotated
into the fourth dimension, it will appear shorter in the three spatial
dimensions, and too, it will translate or gain velocity in the
direction of its forshortening.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment, including the Michelson Morely experiment.





Moving dimensions theory predicts that the measurement of the state of
a photon can instaneously affect the state of a distant photon, when
those two photons were initially interacting. This is because although
they are now distant in space, they are yet at the same place in the
expanding fourth dimension.



The above has been shown in experiment, after experiment, after
experiment.



MDT does not predict wormholes, nor multiverses, nor stringy strings,
nor M-theroy, which have never been supported by experiment, and thus
it is to be utterly detested by the machine. MDT would underly all
apsects of String Theory, and MDT does explain an interpretation of
higher, numerous dimensions, if needed by Kaluza Klein et al.



In fact, an instanaeous snapshot of the foruth expanding dimension
would look something like this--every point is becoming a three-
dimensional sphere in units of the planck radius:



http://images.google.com/url?q=http:...uzF7PJ7broOFww



MDT predicts the gravitational red shift. A photon emitted in a region
of streched spacetime will maintain its wavelength as it travels away
from the mass, thus appearing red-shifted.



MDT unifies the dualities--space and time, energy and mass, waves and
particles--all can be expalined by MDT's simple postulate--the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.



Quantum mechanics, relativity, and entropy--interference, wave-
particle duality, quantized energy, time dialation, Lorentzian
contractions, the equivalence of mass and energy, and times arrow all
derive from the physical model moving dimensions theory presents.



The purpose of physics has ever been to unify and explain via deeper,
fundamental, physical models, and that's what Moving Dimensions Theory
provides.

[Only registered users see links. ]


On Aug 28, 4:17 am, ny2292000 <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:


Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dimensions , mechanics , models , moving , physical , physics , statistical , theoryreturning , unifying


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 08-01-2010 02:18 PM
The Theory of Moving Dimensions: Space and Time Are Moving Relative to One-Another Ranger West Physics Forum 8 01-14-2004 06:17 PM
THE ETHER, QUANTUM MECHANICS & MODELS OF MATTER Laurent Physics Forum 6 01-09-2004 11:14 PM
The Law of Moving Dimenstions? Is The Time Dimension Moving Relative To Spatial Dimensions? Ranger West Physics Forum 3 11-26-2003 11:39 PM
The Law of Moving Dimenstions: Time Dimension is Moving Relative To Spatial Dimension Ranger West Physics Forum 6 11-12-2003 01:34 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.36664 seconds with 16 queries