Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition

WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition - Physics Forum

WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2007, 05:11 AM
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition



WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld

In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
near free fall speed.

This model predicts a WTC 1 collapse time of 11.38 seconds, and a WTC
2 collapse time of 9.48 seconds. Those times accurately match the
seismographic data of those events.1 Refer to equations (1.9) and
(1.10) for details.

It should be noted that this model differs massively from the "natural
pancake collapse" in that the geometrical composition of the structure
is not considered (as it is physically destroyed). A natural pancake
collapse features a diminishing velocity rapidly approaching rest due
the resistance offered by the columns and surrounding "steel mesh".

DEMOLITION MODEL

A top-down controlled demolition of a building is considered as
follows

1. An initial block of j floors commences to free fall.

2. The floor below the collapsing block has its support structures
disabled just prior the collision with the block.

3. The collapsing block merges with the momentarily levitating floor,
increases in mass, decreases in velocity (but preserves momentum), and
continues to free fall.

4. If not at ground floor, goto step 2.


Let j be the number of floors in the initial set of collapsing floors.
Let N be the number of remaining floors to collapse.
Let h be the average floor height.
Let g be the gravitation field strength at ground-level.
Let T be the total collapse time.

Using the elementary motion equation

distance = (initial velocity) * time + 1/2 * acceleration * time^2

We solve for the time taken by the k'th floor to free fall the height
of one floor

[1.1] t_k=(-u_k+(u_k^2+2gh))/g

where u_k is the initial velocity of the k'th collapsing floor.

The total collapse time is the sum of the N individual free fall times

[1.2] T = sum(k=0)^N (-u_k+(u_k^2+2gh))/g

Now the mass of the k'th floor at the point of collapse is the mass of
itself (m) plus the mass of all the floors collapsed before it (k-1)m
plus the mass on the initial collapsing block jm.

[1.3] m_k=m+(k-1)m+jm =(j+k)m

If we let u_k denote the initial velocity of the k'th collapsing
floor, the final velocity reached by that floor prior to collision
with its below floor is

[1.4] v_k=SQRT(u_k^2+2gh)


which follows from the elementary equation of motion

(final velocity)^2 = (initial velocity)^2 + 2 * (acceleration) *
(distance)

Conservation of momentum demands that the initial momentum of the k'th
floor equal the final momemtum of the (k-1)'th floor.

[1.5] m_k u_k = m_(k-1) v_(k-1)


Substituting (1.3) and (1.4) into (1.5)
[1.6] (j + k)m u_k= (j + k - 1)m SQRT(u_(k-1)^2+ 2gh)


Solving for the initial velocity u_k

[1.7] u_k=(j + k - 1)/(j + k) SQRT(u_(k-1)^2+2gh)


Which is a recurrence equation with base value

[1.8] u_0=0



The WTC towers were 417 meters tall and had 110 floors. Tower 1 began
collapsing on the 93rd floor. Making substitutions N=93, j=17 , g=9.8
into (1.2) and (1.7) gives


[1.9] WTC 1 Collapse Time = sum(k=0)^93 (-u_k+(u_k^2+74.28))/9.8 =
11.31 sec
where
u_k=(16+ k)/(17+ k ) SQRT(u_(k-1)^2+74.28) ;/ u_0=0



Tower 2 began collapsing on the 77th floor. Making substitutions N=77,
j=33 , g=9.8 into (1.2) and (1.7) gives


[1.10] WTC 2 Collapse Time =sum(k=0)^77 (-u_k+(u_k^2+74.28))/9.8 =
9.45 sec
Where
u_k=(32+k)/(33+k) SQRT(u_(k-1)^2+74.28) ;/ u_0=0


REFERENCES

"Seismic Waves Generated By Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at
World Trade Center ", [Only registered users see links. ]

APPENDIX A: HASKELL SIMULATION PROGRAM

This function returns the gravitational field strength in SI units.


This function calculates the total time for a top-down demolition.
Parameters:
_H - the total height of building
_N - the number of floors in building
_J - the floor number which initiated the top-down cascade (the 0'th
floor being the ground floor)




Simulates a top-down demolition of WTC 1 in SI units.


Simulates a top-down demolition of WTC 2 in SI units.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:14 AM
Polarhound
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

I fixed your title for you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:14 AM
Polarhound
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

I fixed your title for you.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2007, 01:57 PM
kingfish@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

On Jun 26, 7:14 am, Polarhound <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Unreal. The whacked-out WTC conspiracy theories continue...

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2007, 01:57 PM
kingfish@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

On Jun 26, 7:14 am, Polarhound <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote:

Unreal. The whacked-out WTC conspiracy theories continue...

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2007, 05:03 PM
Thumper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition


<[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1182834682.987824.63060@e9g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com...
<snip>

But Henry, did you see Calgary's top speed on his way home from Moab?

[Only registered users see links. ]


Now, that's impressive.

Thumper


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2007, 05:03 PM
Thumper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition


<[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1182834682.987824.63060@e9g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com...
<snip>

But Henry, did you see Calgary's top speed on his way home from Moab?

[Only registered users see links. ]


Now, that's impressive.

Thumper


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2007, 08:54 PM
Freedom Fighter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

<[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1182866274.489542.312720@q75g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...

What is "whacked-out" is your apparently deliberate refusal to read and
objectively evaluate the evidence presented.
Who pays you to post here?


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2007, 08:54 PM
Freedom Fighter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy

<[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1182866274.489542.312720@q75g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...

What is "whacked-out" is your apparently deliberate refusal to read and
objectively evaluate the evidence presented.
Who pays you to post here?


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:06 PM
proehling
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WTC Towers conspiracy: The case for uncontrolled idiocy


"Freedom Fighter" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote


The same people who pay the huge majority of the population who quite
rightly put you in the same category as all the other conspiracy nut-jobs.

[Only registered users see links. ]


Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
case , controlled , demolition , towers , wtc


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition schoenfeld.one@gmail.com Physics Forum 0 12-20-2007 02:01 PM
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition schoenfeld.one@gmail.com Physics Forum 0 12-20-2007 02:01 PM
New Scientist-Artikel zu Hyperspace-Drive Torsten Stütz Forum Physik 87 03-24-2006 02:38 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.17615 seconds with 16 queries