| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| This is really confusing me. I know that electrons and charge flows from the negative terminal in a circuit to the positive one. Yet placing a diode in the circuit contradicts this; http://www.rare-earth-magnets.com/images2/00441.jpg This is somewhat paradoxical. How can a DC flow from + to - when I know the electron flow is in the other direction??? Please help! James |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dear James: "James" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:1wBrh.64867$[Only registered users see links. ].net... Do a search on "hole current". The electrons *do* flow, but the descriptions we have are blind to this "reality". Ever play with one of those little puzzles where you get the 15 tiles on a 4x4 matrix to be in numerical order? It is all about moving the hole... David A. Smith |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dear James: "James" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:1wBrh.64867$[Only registered users see links. ].net... Do a search on "hole current". The electrons *do* flow, but the descriptions we have are blind to this "reality". Ever play with one of those little puzzles where you get the 15 tiles on a 4x4 matrix to be in numerical order? It is all about moving the hole... David A. Smith |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| James wrote: It goes back to when they were first playing with electricity... they knew there must be a surplus of something flowing to where there was a deficiency....they made a guess....and blew it.... They made what they thought was the surplus side positive... and what they thought the deficient side negative... When we finally figured out where the surplus was and what it was we started talking about electron flow from negative to positive... The old one from pos to neg is called conventional current flow... the new one electron current flow... It really doesn't matter which way you think about the flow...when you do the math the voltage drops, etc will work out the same for either... Conventional current flow is still used traditionally in some uses... such as magnetic circuits.... Some people (like me) who are comfortable with both will use whatever is most convenient when going through a circuit...and will blow other peoples minds....<grin> Hope that kind of explains things.... have fun.....sno |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| James wrote: It goes back to when they were first playing with electricity... they knew there must be a surplus of something flowing to where there was a deficiency....they made a guess....and blew it.... They made what they thought was the surplus side positive... and what they thought the deficient side negative... When we finally figured out where the surplus was and what it was we started talking about electron flow from negative to positive... The old one from pos to neg is called conventional current flow... the new one electron current flow... It really doesn't matter which way you think about the flow...when you do the math the voltage drops, etc will work out the same for either... Conventional current flow is still used traditionally in some uses... such as magnetic circuits.... Some people (like me) who are comfortable with both will use whatever is most convenient when going through a circuit...and will blow other peoples minds....<grin> Hope that kind of explains things.... have fun.....sno |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| James wrote: Sorry...do not think I answered your question in my other reply where I explained the difference between electron and conventional current flow. Your link shows diode circuits...the easy way to understand diodes is to remember/think that they conduct when the arrow points toward a negative, they act almost like a short (have small resistance), if the arrow points toward a positive then they cut off (large resistance).... The symbol for a diode comes from the time when only conventional current was used...the arrow shows the direction of current flow from positive to negative. Electron current flow is against the arrow when it is turned on. hope helps... have fun.....sno |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| James wrote: Sorry...do not think I answered your question in my other reply where I explained the difference between electron and conventional current flow. Your link shows diode circuits...the easy way to understand diodes is to remember/think that they conduct when the arrow points toward a negative, they act almost like a short (have small resistance), if the arrow points toward a positive then they cut off (large resistance).... The symbol for a diode comes from the time when only conventional current was used...the arrow shows the direction of current flow from positive to negative. Electron current flow is against the arrow when it is turned on. hope helps... have fun.....sno |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Okay, I think I understand; 'Positive current' is a by-product of negatively charged current flowing in the opposite direction. James P.S. How come conductors don't get 'saturated' with electrons?? "sno" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... the in the |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Okay, I think I understand; 'Positive current' is a by-product of negatively charged current flowing in the opposite direction. James P.S. How come conductors don't get 'saturated' with electrons?? "sno" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... the in the |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Dear James: "James" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:60Grh.17947$[Only registered users see links. ].net... They do that and they get depleted of electrons too... it is called a "static charge". Similarly, this is how a field effect transistor works. A static electric field depletes a region of charge carriers to achieve shutoff. David A. Smith |
| Tags |
| conventional , electron , flow |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| johnreed take 25 - August 11, 2008 | johnlawrencereedjr | Physics Forum | 14 | 09-08-2008 12:47 AM |
| johnreed take 25 - August 17, 2008 | johnlawrencereedjr | Physics Forum | 1 | 08-19-2008 09:51 PM |
| Conventional v Electron Flow | James | Physics Forum | 0 | 01-18-2007 02:07 AM |
| Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! | caltechdude | Physics Forum | 428 | 01-21-2005 09:39 PM |
| Just One Electron Spin Control Makes a Huge Step to Quantum Computing -- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency | Bubba Do Wah Ditty | Physics Forum | 3 | 07-22-2004 03:43 PM |